Comparison Overview

Strand Media

VS

Top Cow Productions

Strand Media

29577, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

Strand Media Group is a company of seventeen advertising, publishing and design professionals. We produce 20 publications each year in addition to other printed materials, such as brochures, media kits, rack cards, business collateral material, duratrans, annual reports and newsletters. The company began in 1986 as Strand Magazine, located in Myrtle Beach, S.C. In April 2000, Strand Media Group extended its services into Charleston, S.C., becoming a regional publishing and advertising company with the purchase of Gateway Publications. In July 2002, we launched a new women’s monthly publication, Sasee, which is now expanding throughout the Southeast.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Top Cow Productions

undefined, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Top Cow Productions, Inc., a Los Angeles-based entertainment company, was founded in December of 1992 by artist Marc Silvestri, who also co-founded Image Comics earlier that same year. Top Cow currently publishes its line of comic books in 21 languages in over 55 different countries. The company has launched 20 franchises (18 original and two licensed) in the industry’s Top 10, seven at #1, a feat accomplished by no other publisher in the last two decades.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Strand Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/top-cow-productions.jpeg
Top Cow Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Strand Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Top Cow Productions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strand Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Top Cow Productions in 2025.

Incident History — Strand Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strand Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Top Cow Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Top Cow Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Strand Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/top-cow-productions.jpeg
Top Cow Productions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Strand Media company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Top Cow Productions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Top Cow Productions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Strand Media company.

In the current year, Top Cow Productions company and Strand Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor Strand Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor Strand Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor Strand Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Strand Media company nor Top Cow Productions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Strand Media company nor Top Cow Productions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Top Cow Productions company employs more people globally than Strand Media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Strand Media nor Top Cow Productions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.