Comparison Overview

STRABAG

VS

Burns & McDonnell

STRABAG

Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, Kärnten, AT, 9800
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, underground engineering, bridge building, tunnelling, construction material production, project development or building management – we are always one step ahead so that we can become the most innovative and sustainable construction technology company in Europe. Diversity, inclusion and equal opportunities are integral to this, who we are as a company and how we work. Together we work as partners to complete projects successfully and grow with new challenges. Together we achieve great things. Let’s progress!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 15,074
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Burns & McDonnell

undefined, Kansas City, MO, 64114, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenges, constantly working to make the world an amazing place. Each professional brings an ownership mentality to projects at our 100% employee-owned firm, which has safety performance among the top 5% of AEC firms. As dedicated owners, we work through challenges until they’re resolved, meeting or exceeding our clients’ goals. We apply this commitment to our communities, too. We live and work in the same cities you call home, so we share a passion to keep them strong and healthy. From fundraising events and community cleanups to educational outreach and mentorship — especially when it comes to sharing our passion for STEM — our professionals work to make our communities thrive.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 14,158
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strabag.jpeg
STRABAG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burns-&-mcdonnell.jpeg
Burns & McDonnell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STRABAG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burns & McDonnell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2025.

Incident History — STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strabag.jpeg
STRABAG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burns-&-mcdonnell.jpeg
Burns & McDonnell
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both STRABAG company and Burns & McDonnell company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Burns & McDonnell company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to STRABAG company.

In the current year, Burns & McDonnell company and STRABAG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor STRABAG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor STRABAG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor STRABAG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STRABAG company nor Burns & McDonnell company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Burns & McDonnell company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to STRABAG company.

STRABAG company employs more people globally than Burns & McDonnell company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STRABAG nor Burns & McDonnell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N