Comparison Overview

S&A Strategies

VS

Planning and Development District III

S&A Strategies

77 Bloor St W, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1M2, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sastrategies.ca

S&A doesn’t just open doors. We’re a hands-on, boutique government relations firm that works closely with leaders and change-makers inside government, businesses, and associations to build relationships, mobilize coalitions, and help shape the policy landscape. We represent big and small enterprises, including Fortune 500 companies, non-profits, private banks and VCs - and we do it across a wide range of industries, including Advanced Manufacturing, AI & Technology, Alcohol & Beverage, the Circular Economy, Economic Development, Electric Vehicle & Supply Chains, Health & Life Sciences, Mining and Sports & Entertainment. We understand the stakeholder map across sectors. And have trusted relationships with pivotal actors and power brokers, enabling us to bridge both divergent and complementary interests and mobilize coalitions of support around key common policy points. We deliver real results for our clients by working effectively inside and outside government channels.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Planning and Development District III

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.districtiii.org

Planning and Development District III is a voluntary association of county, municipal and Tribal governments. Its mission is to provide comprehensive development assistance to its membership and the private sector. The district offers a full range of services that help the region maintain public services and expand economic opportunities. The association is governed by a committee of elected officials, non-profit organization representatives and business interests. The district employs a professional staff with extensive experience in a variety of development and technical fields.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stosic&associates.jpeg
S&A Strategies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planning-and-development-district-iii.jpeg
Planning and Development District III
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
S&A Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Planning and Development District III
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S&A Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Planning and Development District III in 2025.

Incident History — S&A Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&A Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Planning and Development District III (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Planning and Development District III cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stosic&associates.jpeg
S&A Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/planning-and-development-district-iii.jpeg
Planning and Development District III
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Planning and Development District III company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to S&A Strategies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Planning and Development District III company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to S&A Strategies company.

In the current year, Planning and Development District III company and S&A Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Planning and Development District III company nor S&A Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Planning and Development District III company nor S&A Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Planning and Development District III company nor S&A Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither S&A Strategies company nor Planning and Development District III company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

S&A Strategies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Planning and Development District III company.

Planning and Development District III company employs more people globally than S&A Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds HIPAA certification.

Neither S&A Strategies nor Planning and Development District III holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References