Comparison Overview

Storybird

VS

Fosun 复星

Storybird

Bloor Street, Toronto, M8X 2Y8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Storybird is the world’s largest story platform for young writers and readers. Seven million members have created 25 million stories using our unique tools, and 600,000 educators around the world have brought us into classrooms to inspire the next generation of storytellers. We're one part educational platform, one part real-time publishing, and one part social network. It's a gummy mix that's a big engineering, product, and community challenge. We're always on the lookout for people who can help us build an elegant environment for people to tell their stories. Critical thinkers who are pragmatic, independent, and passionate about their craft.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Fosun 复星

600, ZHONGSHAN NO.2 ROAD(E) SHANGHAI, 200010 PRC, Shanghai, 200010, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Fosun was founded in 1992. After more than 30 years of development, Fosun has become a global innovation-driven consumer group. Adhering to the mission of creating happier lives for families worldwide, Fosun is committed to creating a global happiness ecosystem fulfilling the needs for families in health, happiness, and wealth. In 2007, Fosun International Limited was listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX stock code: 00656). As of 31 December 2024, Fosun International's total assets amounted to RMB796.5 billion and it received an AA MSCI ESG rating.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 17,203
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storybird-inc..jpeg
Storybird
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Storybird
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fosun 复星
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Storybird in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fosun 复星 in 2025.

Incident History — Storybird (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Storybird cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fosun 复星 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fosun 复星 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storybird-inc..jpeg
Storybird
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2015
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fosun 复星 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Storybird company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Storybird company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Fosun 复星 company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fosun 复星 company and Storybird company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Storybird company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Storybird company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Fosun 复星 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Storybird company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Storybird company nor Fosun 复星 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fosun 复星 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Storybird company.

Fosun 复星 company employs more people globally than Storybird company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Storybird nor Fosun 复星 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.