Comparison Overview

Storm King Art Center

VS

Utah's Hogle Zoo

Storm King Art Center

1 Museum Road, New Windsor, New York, US, 12553
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stormking.org

Storm King Art Center is a 500-acre outdoor museum located in New York’s Hudson Valley, where visitors experience large-scale sculpture and site-specific commissions under open sky. Committed to supporting artists and stewarding its landscape, Storm King nurtures a vibrant bond between art, nature, and people, creating a place where discovery is limitless.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Utah's Hogle Zoo

2600 E Sunnyside Ave, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hoglezoo.org

Utah's Hogle Zoo creates champions for wildlife. We are located in Salt Lake City at the mouth of Emigration Canyon. Our property spans over 42 acres of hillside terrain and is home to diverse resident animals. Visitors of all ages and backgrounds can enjoy hundreds of animals in Wild Utah, African Savanna, Great Apes, Primate Forest, Small Animal Building, Rocky Shores, and Asian Highlands. Families can also enjoy a spin on the carousel or let the little ones explore the playground or splash pad. As a non-profit 501(c) (3) organization, Utah's Hogle Zoo meets and exceeds the highest animal care, welfare, and facilities standards in the world as an accredited member of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) -- a distinction given to only 10% of animal institutions. Utah’s Hogle Zoo is grateful to be part of the Zoo, Arts, & Parks (ZAP) program. ZAP aims to enhance Salt Lake County resident and visitor experiences through art, cultural, and recreational offerings. Utah's Hogle Zoo welcomes resourceful employees passionate about preserving the natural world and taking our mission to heart. Every position, from cashier to keeper, is vital to creating champions for wildlife each day.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 155
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storm-king-art-center.jpeg
Storm King Art Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hogle-zoo.jpeg
Utah's Hogle Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Storm King Art Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Utah's Hogle Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Storm King Art Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Utah's Hogle Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — Storm King Art Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Storm King Art Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Utah's Hogle Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utah's Hogle Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storm-king-art-center.jpeg
Storm King Art Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hogle-zoo.jpeg
Utah's Hogle Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Utah's Hogle Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Storm King Art Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Utah's Hogle Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Storm King Art Center company.

In the current year, Utah's Hogle Zoo company and Storm King Art Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Utah's Hogle Zoo company nor Storm King Art Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Utah's Hogle Zoo company nor Storm King Art Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Utah's Hogle Zoo company nor Storm King Art Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Storm King Art Center company nor Utah's Hogle Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Storm King Art Center company nor Utah's Hogle Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Utah's Hogle Zoo company employs more people globally than Storm King Art Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Storm King Art Center nor Utah's Hogle Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References