Comparison Overview

Storm International

VS

Fox Cub Games

Storm International

Stroombaan 6, Amstelveen, North Holland, 1181VX, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Storm International is a gaming business operator with a recognized focus on high-end gaming and service wherever we operate. The company has over 30 years of history and experience in running gaming and entertainment facilities in various countries all over the world. The operations vary in scale, from a stand-alone operation to full-scale entertainment complexes. Storm is a diversified gaming company with independent business-units managed by teams of our professionals locally, reporting to and receiving support from our central strategic, financial, IT, legal, HR, marketing and PR departments. We create a competitive advantage through a branded gaming experience – a strategy proven with the success of Shangri La casinos in the markets of different countries. Our technical expertise with our central IT department and own in-house developed Casino Management Systems are now recognized as one of the best in the world. Our current operation: Shangri La Tbilisi, Shangri La Yerevan, Storm Casinos Germany and online site: Shangrila.com.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fox Cub Games

San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Fox Cub Games is a profitable startup founded by a group of ex-Zynga employees. We are focusing on bringing mobile entertainment to the masses. Currently, Fox Cub Games is focused on creating mobile free-to-play Slots. Slots Vacation is our main live game, currently ranked #7 for Slots downloads. It is a successful game that we still actively work on. We also have another game in development that we’re very excited about. The new game in development is fantasy-based with lots of colorful gems, sparkles, and a touch of magic. Our company is fully remote, so you can work from home. We offer competitive pay.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storm-international.jpeg
Storm International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-cub-games.jpeg
Fox Cub Games
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Storm International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fox Cub Games
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Storm International in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fox Cub Games in 2025.

Incident History — Storm International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Storm International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fox Cub Games (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fox Cub Games cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/storm-international.jpeg
Storm International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-cub-games.jpeg
Fox Cub Games
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Storm International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fox Cub Games company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fox Cub Games company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Storm International company.

In the current year, Fox Cub Games company and Storm International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fox Cub Games company nor Storm International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fox Cub Games company nor Storm International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fox Cub Games company nor Storm International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Storm International company nor Fox Cub Games company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Storm International company nor Fox Cub Games company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Storm International company employs more people globally than Fox Cub Games company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Storm International nor Fox Cub Games holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H