Comparison Overview

Stonehouse Signs

VS

Able Printing Co.

Stonehouse Signs

5550 W. 60th Ave, Arvada, 80001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://stonehousesigns.com

Since the 2nd year of the civil war, Stonehouse Signs has had a commitment to excellence and the willingness to take the road less traveled to guarantee customer satisfaction. Our depth of knowledge and devotion to the highest standards for visual communication products has allowed us to develop long-lasting relationships that define our business today. Providing that personal touch or custom product might be our specialty, but Stonehouse Signs is much more than that. There’s a person behind each sign, and each order. Let us guide you to the product that is exactly what you need, not just something that will work Our success is based on our relationship with you and delivering on our values. With every order, from a standard stock item to your custom request, Stonehouse delivers- lightning fast. Stonehouse Signs offers a full line of safety, traffic and facility signs and accessories, accident prevention tags, and customized dry erase boards. Visit our Industries page if you are looking for pipeline, telecommunications or ski signs, along with any other industry-specific products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Able Printing Co.

623 N. Manhattan Ave., Manhattan, Kansas 66502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ableprintingcompany.com

Able Printing Company has over 25 years of printing experience to make your next printing need a complete success. Our clientele are nationwide yet we focus on that local flavor and service level you expect. Our on-site digital presses give us the ability to turn your projects around in a short time. We can also store your files for repeat work and easier editing. This helps you manage your inventory of printed materials and reduce exposure to outdated information. We can handle the simplest jobs to large scale projects. Our experience and knowledge goes to work for you. We are always available for consultation and recommendations to help all of your projects look their best. When you succeed we succeed! We are an environmentally conscious printer and recycle all of our excess print, cuttings and packaging materials.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonehouse-signs.jpeg
Stonehouse Signs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/able-printing-co-.jpeg
Able Printing Co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stonehouse Signs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Able Printing Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stonehouse Signs in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Able Printing Co. in 2025.

Incident History — Stonehouse Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stonehouse Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Able Printing Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Able Printing Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonehouse-signs.jpeg
Stonehouse Signs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/able-printing-co-.jpeg
Able Printing Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Able Printing Co. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stonehouse Signs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Able Printing Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stonehouse Signs company.

In the current year, Able Printing Co. company and Stonehouse Signs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Able Printing Co. company nor Stonehouse Signs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Able Printing Co. company nor Stonehouse Signs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Able Printing Co. company nor Stonehouse Signs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stonehouse Signs company nor Able Printing Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stonehouse Signs company nor Able Printing Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stonehouse Signs company employs more people globally than Able Printing Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stonehouse Signs nor Able Printing Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References