Comparison Overview

Stone Belt Arc, Inc.

VS

Ever Well Health Systems

Stone Belt Arc, Inc.

2815 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN, 47408, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Stone Belt is one of the oldest and largest service providers for individuals with developmental disabilities in south central Indiana. We are committed to quality service and invite the entire community to play a role in preparing, empowering and supporting persons with developmental disabilities. We value Stone Belt's tradition of excellence and leadership in the field that is founded on our belief that everyone deserves dignity, self-worth and the right to self-determination. A leading employer, Stone Belt has received accolades for the meaningful jobs provided in Bloomington, Columbus and Bedford.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 307
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ever Well Health Systems

300 James Way, Pismo Beach, California, 93449, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Ever Well was established to grow the next generation of modern treatment communities and serve people from all walks of life that have or may face significant mental, emotional, cognitive or substance use issues. Our integrated healthcare system of facilities, programs and providers set the most effective, mindful and dignified standard for behavioral healthcare. Our Modern Treatment Communities (MTC) have their roots in social welfare, psychiatry, psychology, sociology and more recently, addiction treatment. By providing an array of integrated services which include primary care; residential treatment with aftercare support; mental health services; and transitional housing with supportive services, Ever Well has landed on the most effective set of services that lead to lasting recovery for individuals with behavioral health issues. Each Ever Well Enclave is purposefully designed to maximize the benefits of the modern treatment community and focuses on creating the conditions necessary for true recovery. Integral to the model is compassion for human dignity and genuine regard for the person. Our Ever Well Resources for Recovery include community living supports, crisis reconciliation, targeted residential treatment, and extended care recovery programs located in and around our regional enclaves. For more information call (888) 356-1373

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stone-belt-arc.jpeg
Stone Belt Arc, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ever-well-health.jpeg
Ever Well Health Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stone Belt Arc, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ever Well Health Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stone Belt Arc, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ever Well Health Systems in 2026.

Incident History — Stone Belt Arc, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ever Well Health Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ever Well Health Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stone-belt-arc.jpeg
Stone Belt Arc, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ever-well-health.jpeg
Ever Well Health Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ever Well Health Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ever Well Health Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company.

In the current year, Ever Well Health Systems company and Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ever Well Health Systems company nor Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ever Well Health Systems company nor Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ever Well Health Systems company nor Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company nor Ever Well Health Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company nor Ever Well Health Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stone Belt Arc, Inc. company employs more people globally than Ever Well Health Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stone Belt Arc, Inc. nor Ever Well Health Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N