Comparison Overview

Stolberg & Townsend, P.A.

VS

Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors

Stolberg & Townsend, P.A.

3321 Henderson Boulevard, Tampa, FL, 33609, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. is a full service law firm, providing clients' with high quality representation in all areas of personal injury, auto accidents, wrongful death, nursing home abuse, medical malpractice, social security disability, workers' compensation, longshore and harbor workers compensation and state disability retirement law. The firm, formerly known as Barrs, Williamson, Stolberg & Townsend, P.A., has been in existence since 1967. Attorney Byron Townsend and Vicki Stolberg are both Board Certified in Workers' Compensation law by The Florida Bar. This Tampa law firm specializes in representing disabled individuals.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors

undefined, undefined, undefined, SW19 1QE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Based in Wimbledon, South West London, Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors provides immigration law, employment law, conveyancing and litigation services to private clients and small business. The firm provides attentive, cost-effective legal services. In particular, we have an outstanding success rate in appeals before the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stolberg-&-townsend-p-a-.jpeg
Stolberg & Townsend, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahill-de-fonseka-solicitors.jpeg
Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stolberg & Townsend, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stolberg-&-townsend-p-a-.jpeg
Stolberg & Townsend, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahill-de-fonseka-solicitors.jpeg
Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company.

In the current year, Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company and Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company nor Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company nor Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company nor Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. company employs more people globally than Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stolberg & Townsend, P.A. nor Cahill De Fonseka Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X