Comparison Overview

Stockport Mind

VS

Learning ARTS

Stockport Mind

23 High Street, Stockport, SK1 1EG, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Stockport Mind is an independent adult mental health charity that offers friendly, accessible support and information to promote wellbeing in the community. Stockport Mind was set up by a group of volunteers in 1971 and is affiliated to National Mind, one of the leading mental health charities in England and Wales. We are run by a board of Trustees, volunteers and paid staff. Values and Ethos Stockport and District Mind has: •Respect for people, their experiences and their opinions •A belief in the principle of recovery and working with people to achieve their potential •An inclusive and welcoming service that is open access and signposts to an alternative service where Stockport Mind cannot deliver an appropriate service •A belief in a social rather than a medical model of mental distress focussing on the person as a whole rather than on a diagnosis Mission Statement Stockport and District Mind works towards a society where anyone who experiences mental distress is supported in their recovery, empowered to reach their full potential, and they and their family/Carers are free from stigma and discrimination.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Learning ARTS

US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Learning ARTS is dedicated to providing individuals within the autism spectrum with the tools they need to achieve their full potential. Our programs include personalized ABA treatment, social skills training, and support with tools for families and communities. We offer meaningful career opportunities where you can be part of a community making a real difference in the lives of individuals with autism and their families. Our team members are passionately focused on our mission, and as part of our staff, you’ll have the chance to positively impact these lives while enjoying a fulfilling career with room for growth. Learning ARTS is more than just a job - it’s an opportunity to make a real difference in the lives of individuals within the autism spectrum and their families. Our staff is drawn to our opportunities for clinical experience, and the chance to work with a community of individuals who share their passion for helping those with autism reach their full potential. In addition, we value a culture that encourages collaboration, promotes communication and transparency, and fosters a sense of community.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 276
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stockport-mind.jpeg
Stockport Mind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-arts.jpeg
Learning ARTS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stockport Mind
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Learning ARTS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stockport Mind in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Learning ARTS in 2026.

Incident History — Stockport Mind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stockport Mind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Learning ARTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Learning ARTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stockport-mind.jpeg
Stockport Mind
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-arts.jpeg
Learning ARTS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Learning ARTS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stockport Mind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Learning ARTS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stockport Mind company.

In the current year, Learning ARTS company and Stockport Mind company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Learning ARTS company nor Stockport Mind company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Learning ARTS company nor Stockport Mind company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Learning ARTS company nor Stockport Mind company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stockport Mind company nor Learning ARTS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stockport Mind company nor Learning ARTS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Learning ARTS company employs more people globally than Stockport Mind company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stockport Mind nor Learning ARTS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N