Comparison Overview

Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C.

VS

Owllegal Ltd

Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C.

1030 N. Western, Amarillo, TX, 79106, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Dusty Stockard, Jarrett Johnston and Daren Brown founded Stockard, Johnston & Brown, P.C. in 2012 combining the individual skills and extensive experience in the areas of commercial litigation, oil and gas law, personal injury, wealth management, criminal law, and family law. The founding partners of the firm are all natives of the Texas Panhandle with strong ties to Amarillo and the surrounding communities. With clients ranging from individuals to Fortune 500 companies, the attorneys at Stockard, Johnston & Brown, P.C. provide a full-service law firm assisting with matters involving litigation, wealth management and business transactions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Owllegal Ltd

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Owllegal are business law and Alternative Dispute Resolution specialists, who ask the right questions; identify the underlying problems and deliver purposeful; reasoned and goal driven solutions. We pride ourselves on providing the resources of a large firm whilst maintaining the personalised service and cost effectiveness of a small firm. Owllegal utilises, focused briefs, whether in the form of briefing notes, longer briefing papers or oral briefings to keep decision makers informed about issues they are responsible for and allow for knowledgeable decision making. This support plays a key role in today’s commercial market place, where business owners and senior staff must constantly learn and retain enormous amounts of information about an ever-expanding range of topics and issues. Owllegal provides affordable, effective, reasoned support, which is more than sound legal advice Owllegal offer’s a partner to share your vision.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stockard-johnston-&-brown-p-c-.jpeg
Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Owllegal Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Owllegal Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Owllegal Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Owllegal Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Owllegal Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stockard-johnston-&-brown-p-c-.jpeg
Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Owllegal Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Owllegal Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Owllegal Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company.

In the current year, Owllegal Ltd company and Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Owllegal Ltd company nor Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Owllegal Ltd company nor Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Owllegal Ltd company nor Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company nor Owllegal Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. company nor Owllegal Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stockard, Johnston, Brown, & Netardus P.C. nor Owllegal Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X