Comparison Overview

STM ingegneria

VS

BHR Group

STM ingegneria

Via Mattielli, 10, Soave, 37038, IT
Last Update: 2026-03-14
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stmingegneria.eu

Società di ingegneria operante nel settore impiantistico basata sulla ventennale esperienza dei soci fondatori. I nostri campi di competenza sono l'impiantistica HVAC civile ed industriale sia tradizionale che con l'utilizzo di energie rinnovabili. La nostra competenza comprende la progettazione e la Direzione Lavori per la costruzione di acquedotti, gasdotti e fognature.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

BHR Group

College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AJ, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bhrgroup.com

BHR Group has led the field of fluid engineering since 1947. We help companies maintain their competitive edge by providing independent and impartial expert advice, specialising in fluid engineering, technical services and knowledge transfer, internationally. We grew out of the BHRA (British Hydromechanics Research Association); one of the founding Research Associations established by the UK government in the late 1940’s. Our customers value our: – Impartial, confidential and expert advice – Multi-discipline, integrated technical services – Access to a unique database of reports and network of experts – Advanced engineering designs and performance – Optimisation of processes, plant and products – Knowledge transfer Our Integrated solutions and services comprise: – Engineering consultancy – Contract and collaborative research – Computational modelling and simulation – Physical modelling – Qualification testing – Product development – Technology transfer You can sign up for our newsletter here - http://eepurl.com/bAkvp1 BHR Group is the trading name for VirtualPiE Limited, a UK based independent and privately owned company.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stm-ingegneria.jpeg
STM ingegneria
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhr-group.jpeg
BHR Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STM ingegneria
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BHR Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STM ingegneria in 2026.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BHR Group in 2026.

Incident History — STM ingegneria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STM ingegneria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BHR Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BHR Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stm-ingegneria.jpeg
STM ingegneria
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhr-group.jpeg
BHR Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

STM ingegneria company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BHR Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BHR Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to STM ingegneria company.

In the current year, BHR Group company and STM ingegneria company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BHR Group company nor STM ingegneria company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BHR Group company nor STM ingegneria company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BHR Group company nor STM ingegneria company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STM ingegneria company nor BHR Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BHR Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to STM ingegneria company.

BHR Group company employs more people globally than STM ingegneria company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STM ingegneria nor BHR Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References