Comparison Overview

St. Luke's Health System

VS

Siemens Healthineers

St. Luke's Health System

190 East Bannock Street, Boise, Idaho, US, 83712
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.stlukesonline.org

As the only Idaho-based, not-for-profit health system, St. Luke’s Health System is dedicated to our mission “To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.” Today that means not only treating you when you’re sick or hurt, but doing everything we can to help you be as healthy as possible. Working together, we share resources, skills, and knowledge to provide the best possible care, no matter which of our hospitals you choose. Each St. Luke’s Health System hospital is nationally recognized for excellence in patient care, with prestigious awards and designations reflecting the exceptional care that is synonymous with the St. Luke's name.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,947
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Siemens Healthineers

Siemensstr. 3, Forchheim, DE, 91301
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://siemens-healthineers.com

Siemens Healthineers is a leading medtech company with over 125 years of experience. We pioneer breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. Our portfolio, spanning in vitro and in vivo diagnostics to image-guided therapy and cancer care, is crucial for clinical decision-making and treatment pathways. With our strengths in patient twinning, precision therapy, as well as digital, data, and artificial intelligence (AI), we are well positioned to take on the greatest challenges in healthcare. We will continue to build on these strengths to help overcome the world’s most threatening diseases, enable efficient operations, and expand access to care. We are a team of more than 71,000 Healthineers in over 70 countries passionately pushing the boundaries of what is possible in healthcare to help improve the lives of people around the world.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 43,771
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stlukeshealthsystem.jpeg
St. Luke's Health System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens-healthineers.jpeg
Siemens Healthineers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Luke's Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Siemens Healthineers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Luke's Health System in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens Healthineers in 2025.

Incident History — St. Luke's Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Luke's Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Siemens Healthineers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens Healthineers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stlukeshealthsystem.jpeg
St. Luke's Health System
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens-healthineers.jpeg
Siemens Healthineers
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unlocked bootloader
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Siemens Healthineers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Luke's Health System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St. Luke's Health System and Siemens Healthineers have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Siemens Healthineers company and St. Luke's Health System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Siemens Healthineers company nor St. Luke's Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

St. Luke's Health System company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Siemens Healthineers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Siemens Healthineers company nor St. Luke's Health System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Siemens Healthineers company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while St. Luke's Health System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Siemens Healthineers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to St. Luke's Health System company.

Siemens Healthineers company employs more people globally than St. Luke's Health System company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Luke's Health System nor Siemens Healthineers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References