Comparison Overview

STIIIZY

VS

Mattel, Inc.

STIIIZY

None, None, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.stiiizy.com/

STIIIZY isn’t just a brand. It’s a lifestyle, a culture, and a revolution in cannabis. We’re redefining the game with innovative products that combine cutting-edge technology, premium flower, and pure, potent extracts crafted for those who demand the best. Our proprietary delivery system is sleek, portable, and discreet, engineered to seamlessly fit into your lifestyle. From signature devices to high-quality concentrates, every product is designed to deliver an elevated experience that is bold, smooth, and unforgettable. Powered by a team of visionaries and cannabis trailblazers, STIIIZY is setting trends, breaking boundaries, and shaping the future of the industry. With innovation at our core and a commitment to community, we are here to inspire, influence, and lead the culture forward. STIIIZY isn’t just a product. It’s a movement. Join us as we elevate cannabis, together. Stay lifted. Stay inspired. Stay STIIIZY.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 684
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Mattel, Inc.

333 Continental Blvd, El Segundo, 90245, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://about.mattel.com/

We empower generations to explore the wonder of childhood and reach their full potential. We treat play as if the future depends on it — because it does. Play is our language, and we speak to our consumers authentically by representing the world as they see and imagine it. Mattel is a leading global toy and family entertainment company and owner of one of the most iconic brand portfolios in the world. We engage consumers and fans through our franchise brands, including Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, American Girl, Thomas & Friends, UNO, Masters of the Universe, Matchbox, Monster High, Polly Pocket, and Barney, as well as other popular properties that we own or license in partnership with global entertainment companies. Our offerings include toys, content, consumer products, digital and live experiences. Our products are sold in collaboration with the world’s leading retail and ecommerce companies. Mattel is recognized as a Great Place to Work™ and as one of Fast Company’s Best Workplaces for Innovators.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 12,251
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stiiizy.jpeg
STIIIZY
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mattel.jpeg
Mattel, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STIIIZY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mattel, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

STIIIZY has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mattel, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — STIIIZY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STIIIZY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mattel, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mattel, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stiiizy.jpeg
STIIIZY
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mattel.jpeg
Mattel, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mattel, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to STIIIZY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

STIIIZY company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mattel, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, STIIIZY company has reported more cyber incidents than Mattel, Inc. company.

STIIIZY company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mattel, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

STIIIZY company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Mattel, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mattel, Inc. company nor STIIIZY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STIIIZY company nor Mattel, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mattel, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to STIIIZY company.

Mattel, Inc. company employs more people globally than STIIIZY company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Mattel, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References