Comparison Overview

STIIIZY

VS

Amway

STIIIZY

None, None, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 600 and 649

STIIIZY isn’t just a brand. It’s a lifestyle, a culture, and a revolution in cannabis. We’re redefining the game with innovative products that combine cutting-edge technology, premium flower, and pure, potent extracts crafted for those who demand the best. Our proprietary delivery system is sleek, portable, and discreet, engineered to seamlessly fit into your lifestyle. From signature devices to high-quality concentrates, every product is designed to deliver an elevated experience that is bold, smooth, and unforgettable. Powered by a team of visionaries and cannabis trailblazers, STIIIZY is setting trends, breaking boundaries, and shaping the future of the industry. With innovation at our core and a commitment to community, we are here to inspire, influence, and lead the culture forward. STIIIZY isn’t just a product. It’s a movement. Join us as we elevate cannabis, together. Stay lifted. Stay inspired. Stay STIIIZY.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 684
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Amway

7575 Fulton Street East, None, Ada, Michigan, US, 49355
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Amway is a business owner-led health and wellbeing company based in Ada, Michigan, USA. It is committed to helping people live better, healthier lives across more than 100 markets and territories worldwide. Top-selling brands for Amway are Nutrilite™, Artistry™, and XS™ —all sold exclusively by entrepreneurs who are known as Amway Business Owners. Amway is the No.1 direct selling company in the world, according to the Direct Selling News Global 100, based on 2024 revenue. For company news, visit www.amwayglobal.com/newsroom/

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 21,117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stiiizy.jpeg
STIIIZY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amway.jpeg
Amway
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STIIIZY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amway
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

STIIIZY has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amway in 2025.

Incident History — STIIIZY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STIIIZY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stiiizy.jpeg
STIIIZY
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amway.jpeg
Amway
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amway company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to STIIIZY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

STIIIZY company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Amway company has not reported any.

In the current year, STIIIZY company has reported more cyber incidents than Amway company.

STIIIZY company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Amway company has not reported such incidents publicly.

STIIIZY company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Amway company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Amway company nor STIIIZY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STIIIZY company nor Amway company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither STIIIZY company nor Amway company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Amway company employs more people globally than STIIIZY company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STIIIZY nor Amway holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N