Comparison Overview

Stickershark

VS

Next Printing

Stickershark

32 forsyth landing blvd, forsyth, Georgia, US, 31029
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

StickerShark was created to be your one stop online print shop. We print high quality stickers, t-shirts, banners, signs and more. With unbeatable prices and turnaround we continue to grow into one of the most well know online print shops. Check out our brand new redesigned website now to create your own high quality custom product.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Next Printing

3-5/2 Burrrows Rd South, St Peters, NSW, 2044, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Imagine a world where there are no limits on what you can create. Where any idea can become a masterpiece; where you are guided through every step. Welcome to Next Printing – where an artwork becomes a masterpiece. Next is Australia's leading large format digital printing company — your destination for exceptional colour, innovative print materials and unmatched graphic solutions. Our commitment to quality customer service and investment in the latest digital technology combines with our years of experience to transform your next artwork into a work of art.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stickershark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stickershark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Next Printing
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stickershark in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Stickershark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stickershark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Next Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stickershark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/next-printing.jpeg
Next Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stickershark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Next Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Next Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stickershark company.

In the current year, Next Printing company and Stickershark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Next Printing company nor Stickershark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Next Printing company nor Stickershark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Next Printing company nor Stickershark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stickershark company nor Next Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stickershark company nor Next Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Next Printing company employs more people globally than Stickershark company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stickershark nor Next Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N