Comparison Overview

Stichting Schakelring

VS

Mass General Brigham

Stichting Schakelring

Eikendonklaan 1, Waalwijk, 5143 NG, NL
Last Update: 2026-02-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.schakelring.nl

Schakelring ondersteunt ouderen in regio Waalwijk, Heusden, Loon op Zand en Tilburg. Vanuit een mensgerichte cultuur vormen (wijk)bewoners, familie, vrijwilligers en medewerkers samen Schakelring. Stuk voor stuk betrokken mensen met een warm hart. Mensen die met de handen uit de mouwen klaarstaan om een ander te helpen. Allen met één missie: ondersteunen van ouderen bij het leven en genieten, van mens tot mensen.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mass General Brigham

399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, Massachusetts, US, 02145
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 700 and 749
https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization that is committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations and a principal teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,230
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-schakelring.jpeg
Stichting Schakelring
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-general-brigham.jpeg
Mass General Brigham
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stichting Schakelring
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mass General Brigham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stichting Schakelring in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mass General Brigham in 2026.

Incident History — Stichting Schakelring (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stichting Schakelring cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mass General Brigham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mass General Brigham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-schakelring.jpeg
Stichting Schakelring
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-general-brigham.jpeg
Mass General Brigham
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Stichting Schakelring company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mass General Brigham company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mass General Brigham company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Stichting Schakelring company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mass General Brigham company and Stichting Schakelring company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mass General Brigham company nor Stichting Schakelring company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Mass General Brigham company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Stichting Schakelring company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mass General Brigham company nor Stichting Schakelring company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stichting Schakelring company nor Mass General Brigham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mass General Brigham company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stichting Schakelring company.

Mass General Brigham company employs more people globally than Stichting Schakelring company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stichting Schakelring nor Mass General Brigham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References