Comparison Overview

Stichting Pergamijn

VS

Tulsa Boys Home

Stichting Pergamijn

Mercator 2, Sittard, 6135 KW, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Pergamijn ziet als haar kernopdracht dat ze met de haar ter beschikking staande middelen het leven van cliënten met verstandelijke beperkingen op basis van hun keuzen, kansen en mogelijkheden ondersteunt en begeleidt. Om die keuzen, kansen en mogelijkheden voor de cliënten te kunnen bieden, heeft Pergamijn een zo gevarieerd mogelijk aanbod aan voorzieningen voor wonen, werken, daginvulling en ontspanning. In de ondersteuning en begeleiding is veel variatie toegespitst op de individuele cliënt. Het werkgebied is groot: Midden-Limburg, Westelijke Mijnstreek, Parkstad (Oostelijk Zuid-Limburg) en Heuvelland.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 583
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tulsa Boys Home

PO Box 1101, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74101-1101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1918, Tulsa Boys’ Home began in a two-story house in downtown Tulsa. Leaders of the First Presbyterian Church and the Downtown Rotary Club were instrumental in its establishment. Its first two boys were found sleeping in trash boxes in an alley. TBH served more than 130 troubled boys from Oklahoma in its first two years. Each year, TBH delivers residential services to approximately 180 boys and their families. We serve 64 boys a day. In our 95 year history, many of these boys have learned to lead productive lives, and credit TBH for breaking the cycle of poverty, abuse, and neglect that is often passed on from generation to generation without help. Therefore, our good work is multiplied through countless families and the children of the children that once lived, and healed, at TBH.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-pergamijn.jpeg
Stichting Pergamijn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-boys-home.jpeg
Tulsa Boys Home
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stichting Pergamijn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tulsa Boys Home
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stichting Pergamijn in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tulsa Boys Home in 2026.

Incident History — Stichting Pergamijn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stichting Pergamijn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tulsa Boys Home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tulsa Boys Home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-pergamijn.jpeg
Stichting Pergamijn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-boys-home.jpeg
Tulsa Boys Home
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stichting Pergamijn company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tulsa Boys Home company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tulsa Boys Home company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stichting Pergamijn company.

In the current year, Tulsa Boys Home company and Stichting Pergamijn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tulsa Boys Home company nor Stichting Pergamijn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tulsa Boys Home company nor Stichting Pergamijn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tulsa Boys Home company nor Stichting Pergamijn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn company nor Tulsa Boys Home company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn company nor Tulsa Boys Home company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stichting Pergamijn company employs more people globally than Tulsa Boys Home company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stichting Pergamijn nor Tulsa Boys Home holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N