Comparison Overview

Stichting De Advieswinkel

VS

umbrella

Stichting De Advieswinkel

Nieuwe Achtergracht 170, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://de-advieswinkel.nl/

De Advieswinkel is een vrijwilligersorganisatie waar mensen met lichte psychische klachten terecht kunnen voor een gratis, anoniem en vrijblijvend advies van vergevorderde psychologiestudenten. De Advieswinkel verlaagt de drempel om psychologische hulp te zoeken, voorkomt dat psychische klachten verergeren en kan als overbrugging dienen in de wachttijd naar professionele psychische hulp.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

umbrella

EC1V 7LQ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.umbrella.org.uk

Umbrella is a charitable organisation providing services for people with mental health and related needs. We operate across Central, North and South London, in partnership with statutory health and social care bodies, registered social landlords, voluntary sector agencies and service user organisations. Our current service range includes; Nursing & Residential Care; Supported Housing; Floating Support /Community Inclusion Services; Crisis Support; Services for people with personality disorders, problems with substance misuse and complex needs; Vocational Training and Social Enterprises.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 305
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-de-advieswinkel.jpeg
Stichting De Advieswinkel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/umbrella.jpeg
umbrella
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stichting De Advieswinkel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
umbrella
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stichting De Advieswinkel in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for umbrella in 2026.

Incident History — Stichting De Advieswinkel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stichting De Advieswinkel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — umbrella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

umbrella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-de-advieswinkel.jpeg
Stichting De Advieswinkel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/umbrella.jpeg
umbrella
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

umbrella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stichting De Advieswinkel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, umbrella company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stichting De Advieswinkel company.

In the current year, umbrella company and Stichting De Advieswinkel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither umbrella company nor Stichting De Advieswinkel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither umbrella company nor Stichting De Advieswinkel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither umbrella company nor Stichting De Advieswinkel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel company nor umbrella company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel company nor umbrella company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

umbrella company employs more people globally than Stichting De Advieswinkel company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stichting De Advieswinkel nor umbrella holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References