Comparison Overview

Stewart Signs Limited

VS

Original Smith Printing

Stewart Signs Limited

Trafalgar Close, Eastleigh, SO53 4BW, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stewartsigns.co.uk

Since our creation in 1963, Stewart Signs has been at the forefront of graphic solution production, application, and project management. For over 60 years the core values and vision of Stewart Signs have remained unwavering; We strive to set the standard in the industry by consistently delivering visual solutions that surpass expectation. This commitment is fueled by an unwavering dedication to customer service, ongoing innovation, and the pursuit of excellence. Our services cover the fleet, rail, marine and signage sectors, which provide endless possibilities to create and deliver solutions that turn our clients’ dreams into reality.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Original Smith Printing

2 Hardman Dr, Bloomington, IL, 61701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.originalsmith.com

For 80+ years we’ve been evolving our operations to help marketers build, produce, and implement their strategic campaigns. With unique in-house capabilities and plug-in affiliates spanning all levels of digital and printing sophistication, OSP offers innovative solutions that drive response and positive ROI. OSP is a subsidiary of Taylor Corporation — one of the Top 3 personalized marketing solutions providers in North America. Together, we partner with millions of customers to maximize their success. Our collective expertise, coupled with a diverse product offering, equips us with the tools necessary to create solutions that enable businesses to acquire, retain and sell more. Our Commitment to the Environment As proud members of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) we are dedicated to conserving rainforests and demonstrate that commitment by recycling all excess paper. 2009 Illinois Governor's Sustainability Awards Winner ISO 9001 Certified

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stewart-signs-limited.jpeg
Stewart Signs Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/original-smith-printing.jpeg
Original Smith Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stewart Signs Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Original Smith Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stewart Signs Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Original Smith Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Stewart Signs Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stewart Signs Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Original Smith Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Original Smith Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stewart-signs-limited.jpeg
Stewart Signs Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/original-smith-printing.jpeg
Original Smith Printing
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Stewart Signs Limited company and Original Smith Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Original Smith Printing company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Stewart Signs Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, Original Smith Printing company and Stewart Signs Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Original Smith Printing company nor Stewart Signs Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Original Smith Printing company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Stewart Signs Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Original Smith Printing company nor Stewart Signs Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited company nor Original Smith Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Original Smith Printing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stewart Signs Limited company.

Stewart Signs Limited company employs more people globally than Original Smith Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stewart Signs Limited nor Original Smith Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References