Comparison Overview

Stewart Law, P.A.

VS

Administer Justice

Stewart Law, P.A.

909 East Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Located in the Dilworth area of Charlotte, North Carolina, Stewart Law, P.A., provides dynamic, client-centered representation with a strong focus on business law and estate planning. We are a law firm with a record of success and a reputation for excellence throughout Charlotte, North Carolina, and the surrounding area. We are committed to helping our clients establish and run successful businesses while planning for a sound financial future. We serve a full range of businesses — from local, family-run companies to international organizations looking to establish a presence in the United States. We assist business owners and entrepreneurs with: • Mergers, acquisitions and changes in control • Business formation • Changes in income tax classification • Drafting and implementing policies, including bylaws, contracts and annual reports • Planning for a business's future We also assist our clients with: • Sophisticated Estate Planning • Wills and Trusts • Probate/Estate Administration • Powers of attorney

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Administer Justice

1750 Grandstand Place, Elgin, Illinois, 60123, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

No one should have to face confusing legal challenges alone. Our team of caring volunteers come alongside neighbors to free them from legal burdens so they can flourish. We empower vulnerable neighbors with the help of a lawyer and the hope of God's love. For more than 20 years we have helped create personalized plans to provide confidence, clarity, and freedom. One in three Americans cannot afford the high cost of lawyers. Without access to trusted information, legal problems lead to overwhelming fear, anxiety, and confusion. Trying to find help from the wrong source can result in the loss of thousands of dollars. For a small $30 co-pay we provide a team of people committed to providing a clear plan of action to alleviate confusion and restore hope. Don't wait. Find help or join us because everyone deserves access to justice.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stewart-law-pa.jpeg
Stewart Law, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/administer-justice.jpeg
Administer Justice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stewart Law, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Administer Justice
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stewart Law, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Administer Justice in 2025.

Incident History — Stewart Law, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stewart Law, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Administer Justice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Administer Justice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stewart-law-pa.jpeg
Stewart Law, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/administer-justice.jpeg
Administer Justice
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Administer Justice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stewart Law, P.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Administer Justice company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stewart Law, P.A. company.

In the current year, Administer Justice company and Stewart Law, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Administer Justice company nor Stewart Law, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Administer Justice company nor Stewart Law, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Administer Justice company nor Stewart Law, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. company nor Administer Justice company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. company nor Administer Justice company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Administer Justice company employs more people globally than Stewart Law, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stewart Law, P.A. nor Administer Justice holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X