Comparison Overview

Steven's Printing

VS

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company

Steven's Printing

2489 Estand Way, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

𝐖𝐞’𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝! 🖨📊 Steven’s Printing is one of the few print companies that know how to deliver more qualified leads to our customers because we understand that the new era of print is all about selling and measuring experiences. It’s about using print as a vehicle to higher brand retention, more end user actions taken, and more qualified leads delivered. Our clients work with us for our in-house direct mail expertise, and they stay because we offer everything from postcards to pop ups. 💌 We use print to amplify digital and combine digital marketing campaigns with direct mail campaigns to deliver more qualified leads faster. Anyone can put ink on paper, but we have the expertise to help our customers reach their long-term goal of increasing their customer base without breaking the bank. Our 40-year history has enabled us to grow and change with the market. Our clients in real estate, insurance, not-for-profit and utilities rely on us to point them in the right direction of print innovation. We have offices in Northern California and our team is always available to discuss how we can help you get more qualified leads. At Steven's Printing, our commitment to excellence extends across every aspect of our operations, ensuring that each project is executed with professionalism, creativity, and unparalleled attention to detail. 🎨

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company

13555 Sw Millikan way, Beaverton, OR, 97005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

For more than 20 years, PhotoCraft, Inc., headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, has been the leading provider of innovative retail graphics solutions. PhotoCraft offers solutions beyond traditional graphics—we help clients reach customers and build brands with unique fixture programs, store-within-a-store design expertise, and large format motion graphics. We offer complete in-house solutions, including screen printing and digital imaging, as well as a full range of design, finishing, kitting and installation capabilities. Our retail graphics experts help clients develop new ideas and make brands command attention in any retail environment. At PhotoCraft, we produce what others must outsource. The result is shortened production time, improved color management, and reduced coordination costs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steven's-printing.jpeg
Steven's Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photocraft---an-igh-solutions-company.jpeg
PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Steven's Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Steven's Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company in 2025.

Incident History — Steven's Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Steven's Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steven's-printing.jpeg
Steven's Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photocraft---an-igh-solutions-company.jpeg
PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Steven's Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Steven's Printing company has not reported any.

In the current year, PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company and Steven's Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company nor Steven's Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Steven's Printing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company nor Steven's Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Steven's Printing company nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Steven's Printing company.

PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company company employs more people globally than Steven's Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Steven's Printing nor PhotoCraft - A Taylor Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L