Comparison Overview

Stern Bloom Media

VS

Scott Hancock Photography

Stern Bloom Media

425 NW 10th Terr, Hallandale, FL, 33009, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

Stern Bloom Media is an integrated print publishing and product photography studio, focused on creating the best brand image for our customers. For over 20 years we have helped advertisers, manufacturers, catalogers and magazine publishers with all of their graphic design, print publishing and photography needs. Stern Bloom Media will help you achieve a clear, concise brand identity that conveys your message effectively and consistently, getting you results. First impressions count. Our goal is to create designs that influence your target audience and enhance your long-term marketing plan. Our experience in all aspects of the design process ensures attention to detail leaving a memorable, lasting-impression.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scott Hancock Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13

We offer the highest quality portraits, with all the current digital technologies available today. Since 1979, we have provided superior service to our customers and have assisted them in achieving their ideal portrait. Scott’s 33 years of experience and commitment to excellence have earned him a reputation as one of best PHOTOGRAPHER & DIGITAL ARTISTS in the area.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sternbloom.jpeg
Stern Bloom Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scott-hancock-photography.jpeg
Scott Hancock Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stern Bloom Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scott Hancock Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stern Bloom Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scott Hancock Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Stern Bloom Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stern Bloom Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scott Hancock Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scott Hancock Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sternbloom.jpeg
Stern Bloom Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scott-hancock-photography.jpeg
Scott Hancock Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Scott Hancock Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stern Bloom Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scott Hancock Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stern Bloom Media company.

In the current year, Scott Hancock Photography company and Stern Bloom Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scott Hancock Photography company nor Stern Bloom Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scott Hancock Photography company nor Stern Bloom Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scott Hancock Photography company nor Stern Bloom Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stern Bloom Media company nor Scott Hancock Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stern Bloom Media company nor Scott Hancock Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stern Bloom Media company employs more people globally than Scott Hancock Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stern Bloom Media nor Scott Hancock Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N