Comparison Overview

Sterling Technologies Inc

VS

CLYDEUNION Pumps

Sterling Technologies Inc

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Based in Morrisville, Vermont along the spine of the Green Mountains, STI is equipped to work with titanium, ceramics, and other challenging and demanding materials. STI develops innovative processes that produce consistent and predictable results for our customers. We have state of the art 5 axis machine equipment, inspection equipment, clean room services, EDM, and surface grinding, we take pride in tackling the more difficult machine work that other shops would turn away. Looking ahead, STI aims to continue to develop long-term relationships while supporting the manufacturing requirements of our client partners. STI is committed to becoming a recognized and trusted Supply Chain Partner to various industries in the Vermont Way which is to under-promise and over-deliver whenever possible. If you would like to learn more about STI, please visit our website for more information. www.sterlingtechnologiesvt.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CLYDEUNION Pumps

149 Newlands Road, Glasgow, Scotland, G44 4EX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ClydeUnion Pumps, an SPX Brand is one of the world's leading pump companies - a centre of excellence in Pump Technology, Hydraulic Design and Engineering. We are structured to provide a specific focus on each of our customer's key markets as well as providing full global aftermarket support. Weir Pumps Glasgow was incorporated into Clyde Pumps Ltd in May 2007. Building on the success of Clyde Pumps the company acquired Union Pump in 2008 and fully integrated the two companies into ClydeUnion Pumps. The company now has an even stronger team of people and truly global footprint to ensure our customers receive the best products and best aftermarket support.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 291
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-technologies-inc.jpeg
Sterling Technologies Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clydeunion-pumps.jpeg
CLYDEUNION Pumps
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sterling Technologies Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CLYDEUNION Pumps
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sterling Technologies Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CLYDEUNION Pumps in 2025.

Incident History — Sterling Technologies Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sterling Technologies Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CLYDEUNION Pumps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CLYDEUNION Pumps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-technologies-inc.jpeg
Sterling Technologies Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clydeunion-pumps.jpeg
CLYDEUNION Pumps
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sterling Technologies Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CLYDEUNION Pumps company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CLYDEUNION Pumps company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sterling Technologies Inc company.

In the current year, CLYDEUNION Pumps company and Sterling Technologies Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CLYDEUNION Pumps company nor Sterling Technologies Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CLYDEUNION Pumps company nor Sterling Technologies Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CLYDEUNION Pumps company nor Sterling Technologies Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc company nor CLYDEUNION Pumps company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc company nor CLYDEUNION Pumps company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CLYDEUNION Pumps company employs more people globally than Sterling Technologies Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sterling Technologies Inc nor CLYDEUNION Pumps holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H