Comparison Overview

Sterling Performance, Inc.

VS

Creative Design Network, Inc.

Sterling Performance, Inc.

54420 Pontiac Trail, Milford, Michigan, 48381, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.SterlingPerformance.Org

Performance Engines, Engine Rebuilding, Engine Development and Dynamometer Services for Marine, Automotive, Powerboats, Offshore Racing, Recreation, and Motor Sports. Complete Laboratory Testing Services -- ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited – Providing the following services: Fuel Systems Testing: Carbon Canister Testing, Component Testing, Fuel Slosh Testing, Pump Durability Testing. Environmental Testing and Simulation: Environmental Testing Chambers, Thermal Shock Testing, Vibration Testing and NVH Testing. Custom Testing: Custom Testing and Custom Test Equipment Building. Test Lab Services: Battery Testing, Engine Dynamometer Testing. Materials Testing: Magnetic Particle Inspection, Tensile Testing, Performance Testing, Reliability Testing, Salt Spray Testing & Corrosion Testing. Leak Detection: Helium Leak Testing, Evaporative Emission Testing / Permeation Testing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Creative Design Network, Inc.

2231 Stonebridge Circle, West Bend, WI, 53095, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749
https://www.cdn-inc.com

Creative Design Network, Inc. (CDN) is a single source product development partner for several Fortune 500 companies, working on some of the world’s most recognizable brands. Since our organization in 1985 CDN has developed countless products that have been commercially successful in markets such as consumer, commercial and industrial equipment, and healthcare devices. As a single source partner, we offer research, industrial design, engineering, and prototyping services all at one facility, therefore enabling us to react quickly and work seamlessly, to meet the needs of our clients’ high priority projects. We also have been expanding our short run contract manufacturing division. We are able to fulfill low volume production or prototype parts and assembly. Contact us for more details.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-performance-inc..jpeg
Sterling Performance, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creative-design-network-inc-.jpeg
Creative Design Network, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sterling Performance, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Creative Design Network, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sterling Performance, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

Creative Design Network, Inc. has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Sterling Performance, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sterling Performance, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Creative Design Network, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Creative Design Network, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-performance-inc..jpeg
Sterling Performance, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creative-design-network-inc-.jpeg
Creative Design Network, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Administration Exploit
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sterling Performance, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Creative Design Network, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Creative Design Network, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sterling Performance, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Creative Design Network, Inc. company has reported more cyber incidents than Sterling Performance, Inc. company.

Neither Creative Design Network, Inc. company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Creative Design Network, Inc. company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Creative Design Network, Inc. company nor Sterling Performance, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Creative Design Network, Inc. company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Sterling Performance, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. company nor Creative Design Network, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sterling Performance, Inc. company employs more people globally than Creative Design Network, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sterling Performance, Inc. nor Creative Design Network, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References