Comparison Overview

Sterling Direct, Inc.

VS

CityBlue Technologies

Sterling Direct, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sterlingdirectinc.com

Sterling Direct is a "first rate" provider of Graphic Design, Color Printing, Direct Marketing and Business Support services. We specialize in assisting your organization with branding and building customer relationships. We achieve success through the incorporation of proven marketing, advertising and promotional techniques and strategies. Our mission is to satisfy the needs of our clients by providing unsurpassed support, commitment and dedication that meets or exceeds expectations. Enhance your brand identity and increase brand awareness. Consider us a strategic partner in your efforts to build and maintain customer relationships that will be the expression and the trademark of your organization.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CityBlue Technologies

404 SW Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois, 61602, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.citybluetechnologies.com

CityBlue Technologies is an industry leader in providing Large Format Printing Equipment, Drone Services, Digital Platform Solutions and a wide range of products and services for the Architectural, Engineering, Industrial, Power, Manufacturing and Government Markets. CityBlue Technologies is considered one of the most well-rounded solutions for the architectural, engineering, and manufacturing industries. By providing top-of-the-line CAD Products and Supplies, CityBlue Technologies is tough to beat. Our CAD Products consist of our own private label product line along with Oce paper and toner products, RSA (Reprographic Services Association) paper products, HP (Hewlett Packard) inks and papers, as well as all of your Canon ink needs. These high quality products help deliver the total solution. More information is available on our website at https://www.citybluetechnologies.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Sterling Direct, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cityblue-technologies.jpeg
CityBlue Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sterling Direct, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CityBlue Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sterling Direct, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CityBlue Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — Sterling Direct, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sterling Direct, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CityBlue Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CityBlue Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Sterling Direct, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cityblue-technologies.jpeg
CityBlue Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sterling Direct, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CityBlue Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CityBlue Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sterling Direct, Inc. company.

In the current year, CityBlue Technologies company and Sterling Direct, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CityBlue Technologies company nor Sterling Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CityBlue Technologies company nor Sterling Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CityBlue Technologies company nor Sterling Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. company nor CityBlue Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. company nor CityBlue Technologies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CityBlue Technologies company employs more people globally than Sterling Direct, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sterling Direct, Inc. nor CityBlue Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References