Comparison Overview

Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC

VS

Codex Advokater

Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC

2616 South Loop West, Houston, Texas, 77054, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a litigation boutique with offices in Houston and Pearland, Texas. Our attitude is simple, be proactive and not reactive. In the case of trial, this allows us to control the pace and scope of the litigation without becoming overwhelmed and makes our clients feel as though they are in the driver's seat. More importantly, this attitude guarantees preparedness and proper investigation into every case. Our trial and arbitration experience, understanding of business, and strong determination for contributing to our client's long-term success are what set us apart. 832-930-0529.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Codex Advokater

Damhaven 5 B, 7100 Vejle, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

DNA, retningslinje eller standard? Vi kalder det Codex. Codex Advokater er et af regionens største advokatfirmaer. Et stærkt hold på 25 specialiserede advokater og en række fagligt kompetente medarbejdere byder dig velkommen i vores kontorer i Vejle og Horsens. Vi arbejder hver dag for at skabe resultater for vores klienter. Resultater som vi står personligt bag. Vores viden og engagement giver vores klienter en effektiv, professionel og kompetent sparringspartner – i et tilgængeligt sprog. Det er vores DNA – vores Codex. Vi er medlem af Mackrell International, der er et førende internationalt advokatsamarbejde, som består af over 90 selvstændige advokatfirmaer fra cirka 60 forskellige lande. Vi kan via vores internationale samarbejde hjælpe virksomheder med juridiske løsninger, juridisk rådgivning og netværk, uanset hvor I er.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stephens-&-bell.jpeg
Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codex-advokater.jpeg
Codex Advokater
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Codex Advokater
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Codex Advokater in 2025.

Incident History — Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Codex Advokater (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Codex Advokater cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stephens-&-bell.jpeg
Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codex-advokater.jpeg
Codex Advokater
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company and Codex Advokater company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Codex Advokater company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company.

In the current year, Codex Advokater company and Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Codex Advokater company nor Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Codex Advokater company nor Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Codex Advokater company nor Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company nor Codex Advokater company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company nor Codex Advokater company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Codex Advokater company employs more people globally than Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stephens Reed & Armstrong PLLC nor Codex Advokater holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X