Comparison Overview

Stenning’s Chambers

VS

SMR Legal

Stenning’s Chambers

The Highlands, 201 Hillard Drive, West Bay, Grand Cayman, undefined, KY
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Stenning's Chambers limits its practice to litigation and investigations. With only a limited number of engagements accepted and active at any time, we ensure that every client can benefit from having access to an ‘Assigned Counsel’, the same having the capacity to be responsive and supportive throughout the life of the case. We have an innovative approach to valuing our services, offering various options (to include fixed-fees) which enable our clients to benefit from a higher degree of certainty as to the costs they will incur for our services. Strictly subject to obtaining limited admission or approvals (where required); we have access to a plethora of tenant attorneys, door tenants,specialist barristers (to include Queens Counsel) and academic lawyers. With such resources at our disposal, we can build a team to suit whatever the complexity and/or demands of any particular instructions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SMR Legal

65 Nixon Street, Shepparton, VIC, 3630, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our lawyers at SMR Legal are experts in dispute prevention and resolution. Your senior lawyers at SMR Legal are not just ‘general practitioners’. They are among the Goulburn Valley’s most qualified, most expert lawyers. They have the experience and know how to help you. Our Philosophy It is a time of generational and technological change in the Goulburn Valley—a change that requires a fresh and flexible approach to the provision of legal services. We understand that legal matters need to be dealt with promptly, competently and with understanding. Our attitude is about getting our commercial clients back to business and about alleviating and resolving matters for our individual clients so that they can get on with their day-to-day lives.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stenning-&-associates.jpeg
Stenning’s Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stenning’s Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SMR Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stenning’s Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMR Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Stenning’s Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stenning’s Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SMR Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMR Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stenning-&-associates.jpeg
Stenning’s Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smr-legal.jpeg
SMR Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SMR Legal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stenning’s Chambers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SMR Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stenning’s Chambers company.

In the current year, SMR Legal company and Stenning’s Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SMR Legal company nor Stenning’s Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SMR Legal company nor Stenning’s Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SMR Legal company nor Stenning’s Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers company nor SMR Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SMR Legal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stenning’s Chambers company.

SMR Legal company employs more people globally than Stenning’s Chambers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stenning’s Chambers nor SMR Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X