Comparison Overview

Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C.

VS

HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company)

Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. is a boutique real estate law firm, offering a sophisticated level of legal services and advice to our clients. We are seasoned advocates with extensive knowledge of and experience in the real estate market, which enables us to quickly and effectively respond to the needs of our clients. Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg's knowledge of the law, commitment to quality and unwavering dedication to our clients have enabled our firm to become one of the preeminent real estate law firms in New York City.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company)

undefined, Sydney, Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne, Canberra, Newcastle, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

HBA Legal simplifies and solves clients'​ problems across the insurance industry. We build enduring partnerships with our clients and figure out meaningful solutions that hit commercial targets. HBA is an evolved legal services business, with a different approach to practice. Bureaucracy is long banished in favour of plain-English, responsiveness and flexibility. We lead in NewLaw, applying creative thinking to bring expert solutions across legal challenges, claims, risk and business processing. As part of the HBA Group (see @Paratus and @Pillion), we have a unique approach to beating the more-for-less challenge. Find out how at hbalegal.com #insurancelaw #risk #claims #legalsolutions #newlaw #evolved #paratus #pillion #futurelaw

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company)
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) in 2025.

Incident History — Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hba-legal.jpeg
HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company.

In the current year, HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company and Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company nor Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company nor Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company nor Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) company employs more people globally than Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stempel Bennett Claman & Hochberg, P.C. nor HBA Legal (part of Crawford & Company) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X