Comparison Overview

STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC.

VS

COPE Center, Inc

STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC.

514 BELTRAMI AVENUE, BEMIDJI, 56619, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Stellher Human Services provides mental health services for children and families in North Central Minnesota. Since 1994, Stellher Human Services, Inc has been helping families and children with crisis, counseling, and stabilization services in several northern Minnesota counties including Becker, Beltrami, Clearwater, Hubbard, Koochiching, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Wadena and Ottertail. Stellher Human Services, Inc is an enrolled provider under Minnesota Health Care Programs and is a recognized provider under several health plans including: BlueCross BlueShield of Minnesota Health Partners Medica U-Care Preferred One Prime West South Country Alliance Sanford Health Systems Stellher Human Services also contracts with five county social service agencies and 18 school districts to provide school-based and home-based mental health services. Please visit our website for current job postings: http://www.stellher.com/jobs

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

COPE Center, Inc

104 Bloomfield Avenue, Montclair, New Jersey, 07042, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

COPE Center, Inc. is a non profit community-based behavioral healthcare agency serving the residents of Essex County and surrounding areas. The name is an acronym for Counseling, Outreach, Prevention and Education, all areas in which professional staff are actively engaged. Incepted in 1968 by the United Way of North Essex and the Junior League of Montclair and Newark and incorporated in 1971 as North Essex Drug and Alcohol Council (NEDAC). The mission of COPE is to provide quality behavioral healthcare services that are affordable, accessible, and responsive to individual, family and community needs. COPE counselors work in the areas of alcohol/drug abuse, family crises, problems in daily living, and AIDS. COPE provides licensed IOP, OP and early intervention levels of substance abuse treatment for both adults and adolescents; services are co-occurring integrated. Community and School based programs include middle school substance abuse and bullying prevention, parenting skills development, child and infant mental health initiatives.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stellher-human-services-inc..jpeg
STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cope-center-inc.jpeg
COPE Center, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
COPE Center, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COPE Center, Inc in 2026.

Incident History — STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — COPE Center, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COPE Center, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stellher-human-services-inc..jpeg
STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cope-center-inc.jpeg
COPE Center, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to COPE Center, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, COPE Center, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company.

In the current year, COPE Center, Inc company and STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither COPE Center, Inc company nor STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither COPE Center, Inc company nor STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither COPE Center, Inc company nor STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company nor COPE Center, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company nor COPE Center, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. company and COPE Center, Inc company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither STELLHER HUMAN SERVICES, INC. nor COPE Center, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N