Comparison Overview

Steelpipe Ltd

VS

CiM Maintenance

Steelpipe Ltd

224 Neilson St, Auckland, undefined, 1061, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Over 100 years expertise manufacturing high quality, spiral welded steel pipe. Steelpipe has been at the forefront of pipe technology and innovation since it commenced trading as Spiral & Lock-Bar Steel Pipe Company of New Zealand Limited in 1903. Over the years the Company has refined its spiral forming process with the development of butt welded spiral pipe in the 1950s. Today Steelpipe operates automatic double submerged arc welding, with world class non-destructive testing equipment, to produce pipes to the highest international standards for domestic and overseas markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CiM Maintenance

6300 Auteuil, Brossard, Quebec, J4Z 3P2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

CiM Maintenance is a group of experts in asset reliability. For over 25 years, we have helped companies all around the world implement the right processes and technology to better maintain their assets so that they can maximize their production capacity and minimize their maintenance costs. Our award winning Visual Planner solution, a built-in planning and scheduling solution for IBM Maximo and SAP Plant Maintenance, helps companies put in place the right planning and scheduling process to get more work done with the same workforce and get out of the reactive maintenance mode.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steelpipe-ltd.jpeg
Steelpipe Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cim-maintenance.jpeg
CiM Maintenance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Steelpipe Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CiM Maintenance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Steelpipe Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CiM Maintenance in 2025.

Incident History — Steelpipe Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Steelpipe Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CiM Maintenance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CiM Maintenance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steelpipe-ltd.jpeg
Steelpipe Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cim-maintenance.jpeg
CiM Maintenance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Steelpipe Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CiM Maintenance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CiM Maintenance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Steelpipe Ltd company.

In the current year, CiM Maintenance company and Steelpipe Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CiM Maintenance company nor Steelpipe Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CiM Maintenance company nor Steelpipe Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CiM Maintenance company nor Steelpipe Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd company nor CiM Maintenance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CiM Maintenance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Steelpipe Ltd company.

Steelpipe Ltd company employs more people globally than CiM Maintenance company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Steelpipe Ltd nor CiM Maintenance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H