Comparison Overview

State of Ohio

VS

Rijkswaterstaat

State of Ohio

US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ohio.gov

Employment with the State of Ohio is more than ‘just a job’ – it is a privilege to serve our families, friends and neighbors who rely on us throughout our great state. We are a team of dedicated public servants committed to high performance, innovative thinking, and delivering excellent and efficient services. Our goal is to recruit and retain the best talent for our positions, because when we have the best talent, we get the best results for our community. We are #TeamOhio.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 27,825
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2500 EX, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://werkenbij.rijkswaterstaat.nl

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat beschermd is tegen overstromingen. Waar voldoende groen is, en voldoende en schoon water. En waar je vlot en veilig van A naar B kunt. Samenwerken aan een veilig, leefbaar en bereikbaar Nederland. Dat is Rijkswaterstaat. Bij Rijkswaterstaat werk je mee aan de toekomst van Nederland met de ruimte om jezelf te blijven ontwikkelen. Gun jezelf een baan met toekomst. Gun jezelf Rijkswaterstaat.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 12,123
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-ohio.jpeg
State of Ohio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijkswaterstaat.jpeg
Rijkswaterstaat
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of Ohio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rijkswaterstaat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Ohio in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2025.

Incident History — State of Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-ohio.jpeg
State of Ohio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijkswaterstaat.jpeg
Rijkswaterstaat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both State of Ohio company and Rijkswaterstaat company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rijkswaterstaat company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to State of Ohio company.

In the current year, Rijkswaterstaat company and State of Ohio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor State of Ohio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor State of Ohio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor State of Ohio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State of Ohio company nor Rijkswaterstaat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rijkswaterstaat company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Ohio company.

State of Ohio company employs more people globally than Rijkswaterstaat company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of Ohio nor Rijkswaterstaat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References