Comparison Overview

State of Minnesota

VS

Government of Canada

State of Minnesota

75 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Saint Paul, Minnesota, US, 55155
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mn.gov/portal/

Minnesota State Government is the third largest employer in the state of Minnesota, employing over 50,000 diverse and talented employees in more than 100 state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities. Our workplaces can be found across the state in 86 out of 87 Minnesota counties and a small share of employees work in out-of-state locations. When you bring your career to the State of Minnesota, the work you do affects the quality of life of millions of Minnesotans. From those who shape policy, to those who keep us safe, preserve our environment, or take care of our most vulnerable populations, we take our responsibilities to the public seriously. Join us as we continue to serve our great state and build a better Minnesota. To learn more about our career opportunities and comprehensive benefits, visit www.mn.gov/careers. To learn more about our state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities, visit http://mn.gov/portal/government/state/agencies-boards-commissions.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 58,237
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Government of Canada

None
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://canada.ca

The Government of Canada works on behalf of Canadians, both at home and abroad. Visit www.Canada.ca to learn more. Canada’s professional, non-partisan public service is among the best in the world, and many of its departments and agencies place in Canada’s Top 100 Employers year after year. If you are interested in joining our diverse and innovative team, visit www.jobs.gc.ca for information and opportunities. Terms: https://www.canada.ca/en/transparency/terms.html Le gouvernement du Canada œuvre au nom des Canadiens, tant au pays qu’à l’étranger. Consultez le site www.canada.ca pour en savoir plus. Impartiale et professionnelle, la fonction publique du Canada fait partie de l’élite mondiale. Bon nombre de ses ministères et organismes figurent parmi les 100 meilleurs employeurs du pays année après année. Vous aimeriez intégrer notre équipe diversifiée et innovante? Rendez-vous au www.emplois.gc.ca pour obtenir des informations et connaître les possibilités qui s’offrent à vous. Avis : https://www.canada.ca/fr/transparence/avis.html

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 145,761
Subsidiaries: 60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-minnesota.jpeg
State of Minnesota
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-canada.jpeg
Government of Canada
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of Minnesota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Government of Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Minnesota in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Government of Canada in 2026.

Incident History — State of Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Government of Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government of Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-minnesota.jpeg
State of Minnesota
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-canada.jpeg
Government of Canada
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched and decommissioned server
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Minnesota company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Government of Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Government of Canada company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas State of Minnesota company has not reported any.

In the current year, Government of Canada company and State of Minnesota company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Government of Canada company nor State of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Government of Canada company has disclosed at least one data breach, while State of Minnesota company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Government of Canada company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while State of Minnesota company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of Minnesota company nor Government of Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Government of Canada company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Minnesota company.

Government of Canada company employs more people globally than State of Minnesota company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor Government of Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References