Comparison Overview

State of Minnesota

VS

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

State of Minnesota

75 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Saint Paul, Minnesota, US, 55155
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Minnesota State Government is the third largest employer in the state of Minnesota, employing over 50,000 diverse and talented employees in more than 100 state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities. Our workplaces can be found across the state in 86 out of 87 Minnesota counties and a small share of employees work in out-of-state locations. When you bring your career to the State of Minnesota, the work you do affects the quality of life of millions of Minnesotans. From those who shape policy, to those who keep us safe, preserve our environment, or take care of our most vulnerable populations, we take our responsibilities to the public seriously. Join us as we continue to serve our great state and build a better Minnesota. To learn more about our career opportunities and comprehensive benefits, visit www.mn.gov/careers. To learn more about our state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities, visit http://mn.gov/portal/government/state/agencies-boards-commissions.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 58,237
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington, DC, US, 20420
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Official LinkedIn page. We're recruiting the finest employees to care for our #Veterans. Following/engagement ≠ signify VA endorsement. This is a moderated page, meaning that all comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Please show respect to others. Comments that do not directly relate to the topics covered on this page, including commerce, external links, spam, abusive or vulgar language, hate speech, accusations against individuals, or personal attacks will be considered “off topic” and may not be posted. VA reserves the right to determine which comments are acceptable for this page. VA may remove comments that do not follow these terms, or comments that VA may reasonably believe could cause harm if they remain. VA may, at its sole discretion, terminate a user’s ability to post comments to this site for repeated or excessive violations of these standards. For more information, please visit bit.ly/2Q14Y1p

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 197,183
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-minnesota.jpeg
State of Minnesota
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/department-of-veterans-affairs.jpeg
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of Minnesota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Minnesota in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has 207.69% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — State of Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-minnesota.jpeg
State of Minnesota
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/department-of-veterans-affairs.jpeg
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Minnesota company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas State of Minnesota company has not reported any.

In the current year, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company has reported more cyber incidents than State of Minnesota company.

Neither U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company nor State of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company has disclosed at least one data breach, while State of Minnesota company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while State of Minnesota company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of Minnesota company nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Minnesota company.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company employs more people globally than State of Minnesota company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of Minnesota nor U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H