Comparison Overview

State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority

VS

Queensland Government

State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority

Sacramento, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.emsa.ca.gov

The mission of California Emergency Medical Services Authority is to prevent injuries, reduce suffering, and save lives by developing standards for and administering an effective statewide coordinated system of quality emergency medical care and disaster medical response that integrates public health, public safety, and healthcare. The EMS Authority is charged with providing leadership in developing and implementing EMS systems throughout California and setting standards for the training and scope of practice of various levels of EMS personnel. The EMS Authority also has responsibility for promoting disaster medical preparedness throughout the state, and, when required, coordinating and supporting the state's medical response to major disasters. Emergency and disaster medical services in California are rooted in the skills and commitment of the first responders, EMTs, nurses, physicians, and administrators who deliver care to the public and operate the system. In order for high quality services to be delivered with high efficiency, all aspects of EMS systems must work together, mutually reinforcing and supporting each other for the benefit of the patient. The California EMS Authority, through standard setting, consensus building, and leadership, plays a central role in improving the quality of emergency medical services available for all Californians.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Queensland Government

1 William Street, Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4000
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.qld.gov.au

We are the largest and most diverse organisation in our state. We have more than 90 government departments and organisations providing essential services across 4000+ locations—from the Torres Strait to the Gold Coast; Mount Isa to Brisbane. We are passionate about making Queensland better through what we do and supporting our employees to create the career and life that is right for them. This page is monitored by Queensland Government employees from 8am to 5pm, Monday to Friday. HOUSE RULES We encourage open dialogue, but request that you are respectful of other users and their opinions. By connecting with this Queensland Government LinkedIn page, we ask you to keep in mind the following: — all users must comply with LinkedIn policies and terms of use — please do not post content or comments that could be considered • abusive or obscene, name calling, harassment or personal attacks • defamatory towards a person or people • prejudicial, inflammatory or offensive • deceptive, misleading or false information about an individual, organisation, government or entity • personal or sensitive information about yourself or others • in violation of any intellectual property rights, or any other law or regulation • promotion of a product, business, company or organisation • off-topic or spam, including the same comment posted repeatedly. Any content or comments deemed to fit under these definitions will be deleted. Users found to repeatedly post these types of comments will be banned from this page. You should report any offensive material presented on LinkedIn. Complaints about anything you consider to be offensive should be made directly to LinkedIn. CURRENT CONDITIONS © The State of Queensland (Public Sector Commission) 2024 Subject to LinkedIn’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, all content released on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (BY) 2.5 Australia Licence. Permissions may be available beyond the scope of this licence.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 83,837
Subsidiaries: 62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-california-emergency-medical-services-authority.jpeg
State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queensland-government.jpeg
Queensland Government
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Queensland Government
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queensland Government in 2025.

Incident History — State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Queensland Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queensland Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-california-emergency-medical-services-authority.jpeg
State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queensland-government.jpeg
Queensland Government
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Queensland Government company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Queensland Government company has not reported any.

In the current year, Queensland Government company and State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Queensland Government company nor State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Queensland Government company has not reported such incidents publicly.

State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Queensland Government company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company nor Queensland Government company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Queensland Government company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company.

Queensland Government company employs more people globally than State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State of California-Emergency Medical Services Authority nor Queensland Government holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References