Comparison Overview

State Bar of Texas

VS

Tisa Legal Media

State Bar of Texas

1414 Colorado St, None, Austin, TX, US, 78701
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 650 and 699

The State Bar of Texas is an administrative agency of the judicial branch of state government that provides educational programs for the legal profession and the public, administers the minimum continuing legal education program for attorneys, and manages the attorney discipline system.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 357
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Tisa Legal Media

undefined, Destin, Florida, 32578, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

For over a decade, Tisa Legal Media has been providing innovative legal solutions to the Florida Panhandle and beyond. Locally owned and operated, TLM prides itself on challenging the status quo of the legal services industry by ensuring only the highest quality services be offered to the public at fair prices. At TLM, we believe in putting the client first with our Heroic Customer Service initiative. Throughout the pandemic, TLM has been a pioneer in remote proceedings, successfully conducting over fifteen thousand remote depositions, hearings, and arbitrations to date. TLM currently offers an array of legal services including trial technology consulting, legal videography, and court reporting solutions. Our team of in-house legal media specialists are rigorously trained to TLM standards, ensuring unrivaled customer service and professionalism across the board. Our pricing structure is completely customizable to fit the specific and unique needs of our clients. We are known for our unrivaled cost effectiveness in saving our clients time and money. From the conference room to the courtroom, and remotely around the world, we have you covered.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-bar-of-texas.jpeg
State Bar of Texas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
State Bar of Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tisa Legal Media
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

State Bar of Texas has 8.7% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tisa Legal Media in 2025.

Incident History — State Bar of Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State Bar of Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tisa Legal Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tisa Legal Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-bar-of-texas.jpeg
State Bar of Texas
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Network Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tisa-legal-media.jpeg
Tisa Legal Media
Incidents

FAQ

Tisa Legal Media company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State Bar of Texas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State Bar of Texas company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Tisa Legal Media company has not reported any.

In the current year, State Bar of Texas company has reported more cyber incidents than Tisa Legal Media company.

Neither Tisa Legal Media company nor State Bar of Texas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

State Bar of Texas company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Tisa Legal Media company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tisa Legal Media company nor State Bar of Texas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither State Bar of Texas company nor Tisa Legal Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither State Bar of Texas company nor Tisa Legal Media company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

State Bar of Texas company employs more people globally than Tisa Legal Media company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither State Bar of Texas nor Tisa Legal Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L