Comparison Overview

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate

VS

Empire Company Limited

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate

835 N Sterling Ave, Palatine, IL, 60067, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate has been providing real estate expertise to suburban Chicagoland since 1960. We have thrived for the simple reasons that we possess a heart to serve and that we deliver results for our clients. Weโ€™re the perfect blend of a local, third-generation, family-owned company with one of the most respected and admired names in the world, Berkshire Hathaway. As one of Illinoisโ€™ largest and most experienced real estate organizations, we have spent our entire 60+ year existence building our hard-earned reputation for unwavering integrity, trustworthiness, and double-platinum service. Simply stated, we exist to transform lives.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 517
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Empire Company Limited

115 King St Stellarton, NS B0K 1S0, CA
Last Update: 2025-06-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Empire Company Limited (TSX: EMP.A) is a Canadian company headquartered in Stellarton, Nova Scotia. Empireโ€™s key businesses are food retailing, through wholly-owned subsidiary Sobeys Inc., and related real estate. With approximately $30.5 billion in annual sales and $16.5 billion in assets, Empire Company Limited and its subsidiaries, franchisees and affiliates employ approximately 131,000 people.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starckre.jpeg
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/empire-company-limited.jpeg
Empire Company Limited
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Empire Company Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Empire Company Limited in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Empire Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Empire Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starckre.jpeg
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/empire-company-limited.jpeg
Empire Company Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company and Empire Company Limited company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Empire Company Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company.

In the current year, Empire Company Limited company and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Empire Company Limited company nor Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Empire Company Limited company nor Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Empire Company Limited company nor Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company nor Empire Company Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company nor Empire Company Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Starck Real Estate company employs more people globally than Empire Company Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X