Comparison Overview

Stanton | Barton LLC

VS

GreenRoom Inc.

Stanton | Barton LLC

8000 Maryland Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, Missouri, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Trial law firm founded on exceptional client service - lawyers who are resourceful, responsive and efficient. Experienced litigators focused on providing legal services in the areas of transportation, tort and premises liability, products liability and business litigation. With nearly eighty years of combined litigation and corporate in-house counsel experience, our team has the unique perspective of understanding our clients’ legal needs from all sides - from reacting to and aggressively defending claims and lawsuits, to understanding the impact that litigation can have on a business and proactively counseling clients on how to best avoid and protect against future lawsuits. While every firm promises to provide the highest quality of legal representation, our attorneys and staff are equally dedicated to providing the highest level of client service. Regardless of the engagement, our team is uniquely focused on being responsive, resourceful and efficient.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GreenRoom Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Headquartered in Denver, GreenRoom caters to digital creators, influencers, entrepreneurs, and new media businesses. Whether you’re a children’s entertainer, lifestyle creator, pro-gamer or a company new to influencer marketing, we will not only represent you, but we will help you thrive in the ever-changing world of new media. We bring experience and professionalism to every matter and customize our support to your individual needs and concerns.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stantonbartonllc.jpeg
Stanton | Barton LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenroom-inc.jpeg
GreenRoom Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stanton | Barton LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GreenRoom Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanton | Barton LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenRoom Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Stanton | Barton LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanton | Barton LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GreenRoom Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GreenRoom Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stantonbartonllc.jpeg
Stanton | Barton LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenroom-inc.jpeg
GreenRoom Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Stanton | Barton LLC company and GreenRoom Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, GreenRoom Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stanton | Barton LLC company.

In the current year, GreenRoom Inc. company and Stanton | Barton LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. company nor Stanton | Barton LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. company nor Stanton | Barton LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GreenRoom Inc. company nor Stanton | Barton LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC company nor GreenRoom Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC company nor GreenRoom Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stanton | Barton LLC company employs more people globally than GreenRoom Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stanton | Barton LLC nor GreenRoom Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X