Comparison Overview

Stanford Law Review

VS

Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School

Stanford Law Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stanfordlawreview.org

The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary. The Law Review has two principal functions: to educate and foster intellectual discourse among the student membership, and to contribute to legal scholarship by addressing important legal and social issues.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School

1745 PAULISTA WAY, SANDY, UT, 84093, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.superbrandpublishing.com

Publishing books and talking to authors about a better way to keep their profits is the cornerstone of our business. Winsome Media Group was built on the premise that you wrote the book and paid to have the book published, there is no reason you should keep paying the publisher! Winsome Media Group provides an array of high- quality services from e- books to editing, to complete Print-On-Demand (POD) packages. Our self- publishing specialists are committed to the highest quality of customer service. We guarantee that we will return all author calls, emails, and answer questions in a manner that teaches you the publishing process. A little about our products….. As an author, you have complete control of your book rights. We discuss pricing with each author as soon as we have a page count from a completed interior format. Winsome Media Group is unique as a publisher because we do not apply a wholesale pricing structure that cuts into your royalties. That means that you can set a retail price that is competitive with the market and earn royalties that make sense. And, speaking of royalties, Winsome Media Group does not take a penny of your royalties. We set your Kindle accounts up in your name and they are attached to your bank account. We don’t see a penny! Book royalties are paid to you and Winsome Media group does not take any of it for ourselves. In 2013, we started directing our clients to a publicity company that works only with authors. The company was formed by a group of successful authors who know how to get the word out about your book. If you think your job is over once the book is published, you are in for a surprise! Publicity is where the hard work begins. Our upsell promise….we will not call you and try to upsell you on additional products you do not need. Period….end of story.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-law-review.jpeg
Stanford Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winsome-media-group.jpeg
Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stanford Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School in 2025.

Incident History — Stanford Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-law-review.jpeg
Stanford Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winsome-media-group.jpeg
Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stanford Law Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stanford Law Review company.

In the current year, Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company and Stanford Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stanford Law Review company employs more people globally than Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Superbrand Publishing/ Author Traffic School holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References