Comparison Overview

Stanford Law Review

VS

Morning

Stanford Law Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stanfordlawreview.org

The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary. The Law Review has two principal functions: to educate and foster intellectual discourse among the student membership, and to contribute to legal scholarship by addressing important legal and social issues.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Morning

26 rue Marie Magné, Toulouse, undefined, 31300, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://morning.us

Morning est un éditeur et un distributeur de jeux de société. Depuis nos locaux toulousains, notre équipe dynamique et passionnée met tout en oeuvre pour vous proposer des jeux de qualité : notre équipe Produit se charge de repérer de super prototypes puis de travailler leur mécanique avec leurs auteurs, puis notre département Créa soigne les illustrations et le look de chaque nouveau projet. Après cette étape, les pôles Communication et Commercial entrent en jeu pour promouvoir et distribuer à l'international nos produits, dans les boutiques hyper-spécialisées comme dans les grands magasins.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-law-review.jpeg
Stanford Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morning-players.jpeg
Morning
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stanford Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morning
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morning in 2025.

Incident History — Stanford Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-law-review.jpeg
Stanford Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morning-players.jpeg
Morning
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Stanford Law Review company and Morning company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Morning company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stanford Law Review company.

In the current year, Morning company and Stanford Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morning company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morning company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morning company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Morning company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Morning company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stanford Law Review company employs more people globally than Morning company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stanford Law Review nor Morning holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References