Comparison Overview

Standup

VS

Meta

Standup

Houston, Texas 77046, US
Last Update: 2025-05-01 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Standup automates federal revenue growth for government contractors.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Meta

1 Hacker Way, None, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-09-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. To help create a safe and respectful online space, we encourage constructive conversations on this page. Please note the following: โ€ข Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. โ€ข Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. Please treat everybody with respect. โ€ข Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. โ€ข Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. โ€ข If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit https://www.metacareers.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 139,000
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standup.jpeg
Standup
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Standup
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Standup in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Meta has 1150.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Standup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Standup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standup.jpeg
Standup
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Poor Document Handling, Insufficient Redaction, Metadata Exposure, AI Scraping of Public Datasets
Motivation: Financial Gain (Credential Theft), Competitive Intelligence, Reputational Damage, Regulatory Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Facebook Security Alert, User-Executed Command via File Explorer, AI-Generated Image Payloads, PowerShell Script Embedding
Motivation: Data Theft, Credential Harvesting, Financial Gain (Potential Ransomware/Fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Linked-device synchronization messages, Malicious image processing (via image IO library), Exploitation of OS-level vulnerability (CVE-2025-43300)
Motivation: Targeted surveillance, Data exfiltration, Privilege escalation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Meta company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Standup company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Meta company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Standup company has not reported any.

In the current year, Meta company has reported more cyber incidents than Standup company.

Neither Meta company nor Standup company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Standup company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Standup company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Standup company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Standup company.

Meta company employs more people globally than Standup company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.