Comparison Overview

Standup

VS

EduTech AI

Standup

Houston, Texas 77046, US
Last Update: 2025-05-01 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Standup automates federal revenue growth for government contractors.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EduTech AI

Last Update: 2024-01-08 (UTC)

Strong

EduTech AI is a leading provider of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for the education sector. We are committed to helping educators and learners around the world harness the power of AI to improve teaching and learning outcomes. Our AI-powered products and services are used by schools, universities, and other educational institutions of all sizes to: Personalize learning experiences for each student Provide real-time feedback and support Identify and address learning gaps Automate administrative tasks Improve communication and collaboration between teachers, students, and parents We believe that AI has the potential to revolutionize education, and we are dedicated to making this a reality. We work closely with our customers to understand their specific needs and develop solutions that meet those needs. We also invest heavily in research and development to ensure that our products and services are at the forefront of AI innovation.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 27,072
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standup.jpeg
Standup
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/education-national.jpeg
EduTech AI
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Standup
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EduTech AI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Standup in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EduTech AI in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Standup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Standup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” EduTech AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EduTech AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standup.jpeg
Standup
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/education-national.jpeg
EduTech AI
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Standup company and EduTech AI company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, EduTech AI company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Standup company.

In the current year, EduTech AI company and Standup company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EduTech AI company nor Standup company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EduTech AI company nor Standup company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EduTech AI company nor Standup company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Standup company nor EduTech AI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Standup company nor EduTech AI company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EduTech AI company employs more people globally than Standup company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.