Comparison Overview

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens

VS

Foosaner Art Museum

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens

714 North Portage Path, Akron, Ohio, 44303, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens is the former estate of the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company co-founder F.A. Seiberling, and his family. In 1957, Stan Hywet became a non-profit historic estate museum so that the public could benefit from the cultural, educational, and inspirational riches of one of the most significant achievements in architecture and horticulture to come out of America’s Industrial Age. Open for tours April – December, Stan Hywet is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and is Akron, Ohio’s oldest National Historic Landmark.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foosaner Art Museum

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The Foosaner Art Museum is located along the Indian River in the Eau Gallie Arts District (EGAD). We are a gathering place, a catalyst for change, and a center of creativity. The Foosaner collects, displays, and interprets all aspects of the visual arts in ways that relate to the past, the present, and to … Continue reading "Home"

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stan-hywet-hall-&-gardens.jpeg
Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Foosaner Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foosaner Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foosaner Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foosaner Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foosaner Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stan-hywet-hall-&-gardens.jpeg
Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Foosaner Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foosaner Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foosaner Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company.

In the current year, Foosaner Art Museum company and Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum company nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum company nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum company nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company nor Foosaner Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company nor Foosaner Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company employs more people globally than Foosaner Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens nor Foosaner Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X