Comparison Overview

Stamford Museum & Nature Center

VS

Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam

Stamford Museum & Nature Center

39 Scofieldtown Road, Stamford, 06903, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stamfordmuseum.org/

The Stamford Museum & Nature Center is dedicated to the preservation and interpretation of art and popular culture, the natural and agricultural sciences, and history. The Museum is a vital cultural and educational resources for the community, and a focal point for family activity, lifelong learning, and inspiration. We seek to inspire creativity, foster self-discovery, promote environmental stewardship, and nurture an appreciation for learning through exhibitions, education programs, and special events that enhance every visitor’s experience of our unique site.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam

Plantage Middenlaan 2a, Amsterdam, NL, 1018 DD
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dehortus.nl

Botanic garden, founded in 1638 (which Linkedin does not accept as possible founding year, probably we're too old for the digital age..). The Hortus houses more than 4,000 different species of plants, which is about 2% of all plant species growing on Earth. The Hortus closely cooperates with other botanic gardens, both nationally as internationally. Networks: IPEN, BGCI, NVBT (The Nederlandse Vereniging van Botanische Tuinen; Dutch Association of Botanical Gardens), SNP a.o.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stamford-museum-and-nature-center.jpeg
Stamford Museum & Nature Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hortusamsterdam.jpeg
Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stamford Museum & Nature Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stamford Museum & Nature Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam in 2026.

Incident History — Stamford Museum & Nature Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stamford Museum & Nature Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stamford-museum-and-nature-center.jpeg
Stamford Museum & Nature Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hortusamsterdam.jpeg
Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Stamford Museum & Nature Center company and Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stamford Museum & Nature Center company.

In the current year, Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company and Stamford Museum & Nature Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company nor Stamford Museum & Nature Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company nor Stamford Museum & Nature Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company nor Stamford Museum & Nature Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center company nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center company nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam company employs more people globally than Stamford Museum & Nature Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stamford Museum & Nature Center nor Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References