Comparison Overview

Stages

VS

REVERBdance

Stages

800 Rosine St, Houston, Texas, 77019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stageshouston.com/Online/default.asp

Founded in 1978, Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly. The common link throughout our work is a focus on sharing compelling human stories in intimate performance spaces that allow audiences to connect with both the art on stage and the people who help create it. Stages has grown to become Houston’s sixth-largest nonprofit performing arts producer overall, and the largest outside of Houston’s downtown theater district. Stages is one of the region’s leading artistic employers, producing an average of 12 productions per year totaling more than 430 performances and welcoming 65,000+ visitors each season. In January 2020, Stages opened The Gordy, a new $35.4 million three-theater venue that will transform how Houston artists and audiences experience theater.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

REVERBdance

None
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://reverbdance.org/

The primary mission of REVERBdance is to provide local, national, and international seasoned contemporary dance artists including dance theater choreographers, individual performers and dance companies with highly curated professional level productions, educational workshops, and granting top choreographers with funding. The REVERBdance Festival is geared towards showcasing high concept, aesthetically driven & powerful performances to further New York City as a cultural mecca.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stageshouston.jpeg
Stages
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reverbdance.jpeg
REVERBdance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stages
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
REVERBdance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stages in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REVERBdance in 2025.

Incident History — Stages (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stages cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — REVERBdance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REVERBdance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stageshouston.jpeg
Stages
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reverbdance.jpeg
REVERBdance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

REVERBdance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stages company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, REVERBdance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stages company.

In the current year, REVERBdance company and Stages company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither REVERBdance company nor Stages company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither REVERBdance company nor Stages company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither REVERBdance company nor Stages company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stages company nor REVERBdance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stages company nor REVERBdance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stages company employs more people globally than REVERBdance company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stages nor REVERBdance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References