Comparison Overview

Stage Door Dance Productions

VS

Stages Chicago

Stage Door Dance Productions

2720 Godley Ln, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 27617
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stagedoordance.com

Stage Door Dance Productions is reinventing the dance education and youth extracurricular model in Raleigh, NC. With a strong belief in age appropriate instruction and choreography, the studio uses technique, performance, community, and character to encourage dancers to "Be More At Stage Door!" Under the leadership of Founder/CEO, Chasta Hamilton, the studio features two locations, in Brier Creek and at Lake Boone Trail, as well as their unique Intensive Training Program and affiliated non-profit, Girls Geared For Greatness.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stages Chicago

undefined, Chicago, IL, 60607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://stageschicago.org

Stages Chicago is an arts education program founded in 2016 that is dedicated to bringing the highest quality, developmentally appropriate performing arts experiences to children and families. Our curriculum is developed by professional performers turned early childhood development professionals who have decades of experience onstage and in the classroom. Stages is proud to offer a variety of inclusive programming for all ages and abilities. From developmentally appropriate music classes for infants (that are also entertaining for adults) to after school programs that serve as a training ground for the next generation of performers, Stages has it all. In 2021, Stages Chicago transitioned to a not-for-profit organization in order to expand our reach and better support our mission of making quality performing arts education experiences accessible for all children and families.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stage-door-dance-productions.jpeg
Stage Door Dance Productions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stages-performing-arts.jpeg
Stages Chicago
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stage Door Dance Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stages Chicago
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stage Door Dance Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stages Chicago in 2025.

Incident History — Stage Door Dance Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stage Door Dance Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stages Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stages Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stage-door-dance-productions.jpeg
Stage Door Dance Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stages-performing-arts.jpeg
Stages Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stages Chicago company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stage Door Dance Productions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stages Chicago company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stage Door Dance Productions company.

In the current year, Stages Chicago company and Stage Door Dance Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stages Chicago company nor Stage Door Dance Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stages Chicago company nor Stage Door Dance Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stages Chicago company nor Stage Door Dance Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions company nor Stages Chicago company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions company nor Stages Chicago company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stages Chicago company employs more people globally than Stage Door Dance Productions company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stage Door Dance Productions nor Stages Chicago holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References