Comparison Overview

Stafford MSD

VS

Los Angeles Unified School District

Stafford MSD

Last Update: 2025-04-24 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

None

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Los Angeles Unified School District

333 S Beaudry Ave, None, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90017
Last Update: 2025-07-28 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Second largest school district in the nation, LAUSD enrolls 640,000+ students in kindergarten through 12th grade, at over 900 schools, and 187 public charter schools. The boundaries spread over 720 square miles and include the mega-city of Los Angeles as well as all or parts of 31 smaller municipalities plus several unincorporated sections of Southern California. The mission of LAUSD is reflected in continued double-digit growth on the state Academic Performance Index (API); the upward trend in the graduation rate, progress in the pass rate on the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) and other academic indicators. LA schools boast more winners of the United States Academic Decathlon championships-12-than any other District in this country. Add to those impressive victories, outstanding individual student and team achievements in: science, mathematics, social studies, language arts, foreign and dual languages, business and entrepreneurial skills, the visual and performing arts, and athletics. Nationally recognized by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine for serving healthy, low fat and vegetarian school lunches. LAUSD's standards also call for: whole grains, low sodium, locally grown fruits and vegetables and no trans fat; flavored milk or carbonated beverages. Today, the District counts more than 115 new schools and campuses, thanks to the nation's largest public works project, funded by bond measures, a testament to broad voter support.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 44,045
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stafford MSD
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/los-angeles-unified-school-district.jpeg
Los Angeles Unified School District
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Stafford MSD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Los Angeles Unified School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stafford MSD in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Angeles Unified School District in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Stafford MSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stafford MSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Los Angeles Unified School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Angeles Unified School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stafford MSD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/los-angeles-unified-school-district.jpeg
Los Angeles Unified School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Stafford MSD company and Los Angeles Unified School District company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Stafford MSD company has not reported any.

In the current year, Los Angeles Unified School District company and Stafford MSD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Stafford MSD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Stafford MSD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Los Angeles Unified School District company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Stafford MSD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Stafford MSD company nor Los Angeles Unified School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stafford MSD company nor Los Angeles Unified School District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Los Angeles Unified School District company employs more people globally than Stafford MSD company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X