Stafford MSD
Last Update: 2025-04-24 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
Strong
None
NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Stafford MSD
VS
KinderCare Learning Companies
KinderCare Learning Companies
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Excellent
Between 900 and 1000
Transform lives—including yours—with the nation’s leading provider of early childhood education and child care. We don’t just hold ourselves to the highest standards; we set new ones. Our accredited programs, talented teachers, and research-based curriculum empower children to explore their limitless potential while giving families the confidence they need to shine at home and work. Explore opportunities across our family of brands—KinderCare® Learning Centers, Champions®, and Crème de la Crème®! We also offer child care solutions that organizations can add to employee benefit packages. And we partner with schools and entire districts to bring extended-day programs to their learning communities, including before- and after-school programs and seasonal break camps. With over 37,000 teachers and staff across more than 2,400 locations in 40 states and Washington, D.C., there’s no limit to what you can achieve here and what we can achieve together. Think competitive, family-friendly benefits, professional development, generous paid time off, and a work-life balance that helps you thrive.
NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 15,230
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Stafford MSD
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
KinderCare Learning Companies
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Stafford MSD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KinderCare Learning Companies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Stafford MSD in 2025.
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KinderCare Learning Companies in 2025.
Incident History — Stafford MSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stafford MSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — KinderCare Learning Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KinderCare Learning Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Stafford MSD
Incidents
No Incident
KinderCare Learning Companies
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
KinderCare Learning Companies company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Stafford MSD company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.
Historically, KinderCare Learning Companies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stafford MSD company.
In the current year, KinderCare Learning Companies company and Stafford MSD company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither KinderCare Learning Companies company nor Stafford MSD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither KinderCare Learning Companies company nor Stafford MSD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither KinderCare Learning Companies company nor Stafford MSD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Stafford MSD company nor KinderCare Learning Companies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Stafford MSD company nor KinderCare Learning Companies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
KinderCare Learning Companies company employs more people globally than Stafford MSD company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description
mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
References
- https://github.com/mondeja/mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin/commit/7466d67aa0de8ffbc427204ad2475fed07678915
- https://github.com/mondeja/mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin/issues/274
- https://github.com/mondeja/mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin/pull/277
- https://github.com/mondeja/mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin/security/advisories/GHSA-v39m-5m9j-m9w9
Description
go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
