Comparison Overview

St. Louis Print Company

VS

Lexington Graphics, Inc.

St. Louis Print Company

8214 Watson Road, St. Louis, Missouri, 63119, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

St. Louis Print Company specializes contract screen printing. We provide 1-5 day turn around on all orders. Our quality is the best, and to prove it we offer a 100% satisfaction guarantee on every item we ship. Our service is outstanding we aim to build strong relationships with clients. We are a proud American based company and we never contract overseas. If you are you in need of a contract screen printer look no further. No matter where you are in the US, you are only 1-5 days shipping from St. Louis Print Company. Our Midwest overhead keeps our prices extremely competitive. We only take contract work. If you are a promotion company rest assure we are not interested in your clients, and all transactions are confidential. Call for a quote today! (314) 537-2496

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lexington Graphics, Inc.

76 Bedford Street, Lexington, MA, 02420, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Located in Lexington, MA, we offer Professional Printing, Copying, Mailing, and Graphic Design services. We print all types of marketing material, customized personally for your business, including Brochures, Flyers, Letterheads, Business Cards, Banners & Signage, Manuals, Reports, Wide-Format Posters, Promotional Products & much more. We offer Free Delivery to surrounding areas (Orders $25+). As a Family Owned & Operated business for 32 years, we have learned to take care of our customers. We are not just an ordinary print shop, we are YOUR print shop. You call us—we answer, you ask us—we deliver. We know your name, history, your projects, sometimes even your family. At Lexington Graphics, we care—and it shows. Fact of the matter is, this is not just our job, this is our life—and believe it or not, we actually enjoy it!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st.-louis-print-company.jpeg
St. Louis Print Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexington-graphics.jpeg
Lexington Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Louis Print Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lexington Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Louis Print Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lexington Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — St. Louis Print Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Louis Print Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lexington Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lexington Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st.-louis-print-company.jpeg
St. Louis Print Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexington-graphics.jpeg
Lexington Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lexington Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Louis Print Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lexington Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to St. Louis Print Company company.

In the current year, Lexington Graphics, Inc. company and St. Louis Print Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lexington Graphics, Inc. company nor St. Louis Print Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lexington Graphics, Inc. company nor St. Louis Print Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lexington Graphics, Inc. company nor St. Louis Print Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Louis Print Company company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither St. Louis Print Company company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

St. Louis Print Company company employs more people globally than Lexington Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Louis Print Company nor Lexington Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N