Comparison Overview

St Vincent's Health Australia

VS

Encompass Health

St Vincent's Health Australia

100 William St, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, 2011, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 650 and 699

Founded by the Sisters of Charity more than 180 years ago, St Vincent’s Health Australia is Australia’s largest not-for-profit health and aged care provider. As a clinical, research and education leader, we provide outstanding healthcare to our patients and residents in 6 Public Hospitals, 10 Private Hospitals and 20 aged care facilities across New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,412
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Encompass Health

9001 Liberty Pkwy, Birmingham, Alabama, 35242, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Encompass Health is the largest owner and operator of rehabilitation hospitals in the United States. With a national footprint that includes 158 hospitals in 37 states and Puerto Rico, the Company provides high-quality, compassionate rehabilitative care for patients recovering from a major injury or illness, using advanced technology and innovative treatments to maximize recovery. Encompass Health is ranked as one of Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For and Modern Healthcare’s Best Places to Work in Healthcare.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,263
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-vincent's-health-australia.jpeg
St Vincent's Health Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/encompasshealth.jpeg
Encompass Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St Vincent's Health Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Encompass Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St Vincent's Health Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Encompass Health in 2025.

Incident History — St Vincent's Health Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St Vincent's Health Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Encompass Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Encompass Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st-vincent's-health-australia.jpeg
St Vincent's Health Australia
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/encompasshealth.jpeg
Encompass Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Encompass Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St Vincent's Health Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

St Vincent's Health Australia company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Encompass Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Encompass Health company and St Vincent's Health Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Encompass Health company nor St Vincent's Health Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

St Vincent's Health Australia company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Encompass Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Encompass Health company nor St Vincent's Health Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia company nor Encompass Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

St Vincent's Health Australia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Encompass Health company.

Encompass Health company employs more people globally than St Vincent's Health Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St Vincent's Health Australia nor Encompass Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N